| Though it's still showing an increase over stock since the first chart I posted is unloaded with the different TBs. the graph in my post above is not accurate because it actually shows the first pull (unloaded stock) VS the third pull (loaded 54mm) hence the 100+ increase in torque. I do not have a graph from the second pull yet, that's what we need to see paired with the third pull (solid line in above chart). "Evan, I just noticed that the dotted runs are the same on both charts (same time stamp). I'm guessing it is the unloaded stock tb run. I'm interested in the loaded stock tb run to compare with the loaded 54mm tb run. I think the TQ is so high so early because the boost came on sooner with the extra load. Basically I need to compare my first and last runs (unloaded stock and 54) and the middle two runs (loaded stock and 54). Sorry, not trying to be a pain. I just want to be as accurate with my claims as possible.
Thank you Evan.
Rob"
Hopefully he will send me the comparison of runs two and three tonight. I apologize for the confusion folks, please bear with me.
Thank you
Rob
![]() SRC="http://ttp://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c359/RobZ90TT/AZR%201
0/beyondsig.jpg"> |
