| Message |
For $4.99 a gallon, I feel fine with that. And considering that E85 is 25% to 30% less efficient, the cost difference is less than $1.00 a gallon. I'd rather stick with the tried and true. But I definitely get what you're saying. I'm sure sticking to the same station would provide more consistent results. It does make sense. And perhaps if E85 becomes a bit more commonplace (although it's pretty darn common here in IL), maybe the consistency will change. We'll see! But until there's a drastic price difference, it's just not worth the change to me.
 |
 |