Subject	Hi! (n/m)
Posted by	SirpriZ on February 16, 2011 at 4:10 PM
	This message has been viewed 173 times.
In Reply To	I am satisfied with your former reasoning. ;) (n/m) posted by Scotts94z32 on February 16, 2011 at 10:42 AM
Message
Follow Ups	I had my car at SZ for a while - sasha 19:39:25 02/15/11 thanks for posting - vulcanrush 19:54:38 02/15/11 96 the best year? surrrrrree....:) (n/m) - dpjax 19:59:04 02/15/11 oh yes - blackomega 20:04:57 02/15/11 How did they manage to adjust timing? (n/m) - RevTech 20:21:11 02/15/11 Wouldn't you like to know - Seb@Specialty-Z 20:44:38 02/15/11 If I ever find myself shopping for a 96', slap me - FuerGrissa 22:19:33 02/15/11 Re: If I ever find myself shopping for a 96', slap me - sasha 22:48:49 02/15/11 What's holding the 96s back in a HUGE way is - Seb@Specialty-Z 22:55:52 02/15/11 looking at the graphs... - MPV TT 23:44:43 02/15/11 And I think torque is about 14 higher on 100 octane - sasha 00:37:02 02/16/11 I see you're located in SB - B. Lee Wong 00:26:26 02/16/11 We, Z owners in S.B. used to have semi-regular lunches - sasha 00:38:54 02/16/11 Alex, I'm very happy to see that the throttle bodies worked. (n/m) - John@Z1 07:45:48 02/16/11 Thanks John! I always knew Seb would prevail :) - sasha 11:30:52 02/16/11 I am satisfied with your former reasoning. ;) (n/m) - Scotts94z32 10:42:48 02/16/11 At least somebody is! :) (n/m) - sasha 11:32:02 02/16/11 Hi! (n/m) - SirpriZ 16:10:04 02/16/11 Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel hello! - Scotts94z32 19:04:59 02/17/11 nice pull gray (n/m) - The Devils Z 12:29:47 02/16/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.