Subject	Re: You sure it was an 'M' coupe, and not the 2.8?
Posted by	nuck on July 04, 2001 at 6:29 PM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	You sure it was an 'M' coupe, and not the 2.8? (n/m) posted by SactoTodd on July 04, 2001 at 06:04 PM
Message	2.8 makes more sense. Stage IV n/a only puts down MAYBE 205 to the wheels. Has anyone seen any n/a quicker than 14.5 w/o NOS?
Follow Ups	How Did i hang w/ a BMW M COUPE? with a stage 4 - CaptanZap(Bay Area) 17:16:54 07/04/01 An M3 would have given you a better race. - MisterZ 17:23:42 07/04/01 Re: An M3 would have given you a better race. - CaptanZap(Bay Area) 17:35:22 07/04/01 No, it would beat you. (n/m) - MikeM317 (Boston) 18:59:22 07/04/01 Re: How Did i hang w/ a BMW M COUPE? with a stage 4 - socos 17:57:11 07/04/01 You sure it was an 'M' coupe, and not the 2.8? (n/m) - SactoTodd 18:04:43 07/04/01 Re: You sure it was an 'M' coupe, and not the 2.8? - nuck 18:29:02 07/04/01 Re: Re: You sure it was an 'M' coupe, and not the 2.8? (n/m) - nuck 18:41:33 07/04/01 i am sure it wasnt a 2.8 - CaptanZap(Bay Area) 19:33:41 07/04/01 As sure as you are as what headers look like?? (n/m) - SactoTodd 23:27:41 07/04/01 Arnel ran a 14.2 w/o NOS in his NA I think. (n/m) - Grendelrt(VA) 06:48:37 07/05/01 stage4 NA is NOT 279hp. 190-200 rwhp = 240ish flywheel (n/m) - maverick (NYC) 19:52:55 07/04/01 check out www.ttzd.com on their dyno's - CaptanZap(Bay Area) 20:10:17 07/04/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.