Subject	Re: Mustang vs dynajet
Posted by	arrowenterprises on January 19, 2011 at 8:03 PM
	This message has been viewed 188 times.
In Reply To	Andy, Google Mustang vs dynajet posted by FuerGrissa on January 19, 2011 at 07:52 PM
Message	Sounds like there should be a standard by which all machines need to adhere. If the Mustang adds some form of resistance force to generate "real world conditions" then of course it will always be lower. Im my case, I would say an average of the two would be a reasonable compromise. [IMG]http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa354/arrowenterprises/PICT0598.jpg[/IMG]
Follow Ups	Re: DYNO TESTING (cont.) - arrowenterprises 17:47:52 01/19/11 Mustang dynos tend to show lower output than dyno-jet - Mr.Stacy 18:04:23 01/19/11 "I have no idea what I'm talking about" = Y (n/m) - The Hawk 18:30:51 01/19/11 Re: "I have no idea" - arrowenterprises 19:38:10 01/19/11 You made the mistake of asking for input - BigTDogg (MA) 08:26:54 01/20/11 I'm not a dick! ...actually I'm more of a prick! =) (n/m) - The Hawk 12:00:02 01/20/11 I know, was really telling the newbie to get a thick skin :) (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 12:14:46 01/20/11 Searching would answer some of your q's and besides - The Hawk 11:59:06 01/20/11 Re: Dicks - arrowenterprises 19:47:13 01/20/11 Time to change ur manpon. - The Hawk 22:32:25 01/20/11 Now you're catching on :-) - BigTDogg (MA) 08:49:38 01/21/11 Re: Dicks - arrowenterprises 21:23:03 01/20/11 Here is your Pump SAE chart for a dynojet 554 VS 562 STD - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 18:57:13 01/19/11 Re: Thanks for the effort... - arrowenterprises 19:55:30 01/19/11 Re: Re: Thanks for the effort... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 20:23:11 01/19/11 The effort... - arrowenterprises 20:45:59 01/19/11 Delta Sonic here in rochester has 100 at the pump - FuerGrissa 21:31:14 01/19/11 Re: Delta Sonic - arrowenterprises 21:38:25 01/19/11 Re: The effort... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 10:14:55 01/20/11 my stock turbos did 385 WHP on pump - dpjax 19:06:07 01/19/11 @ what boost and octane did you achieve that number? - Dave N 19:09:28 01/19/11 If memory serves me right it was 17.7psi on 93 octane (n/m) - John@Z1 08:50:57 01/20/11 it's a mustang dyno...it's different, aka the heart-break - fuzzymonkey 19:07:48 01/19/11 Andy, Google Mustang vs dynajet - FuerGrissa 19:52:42 01/19/11 Re: Will do. (n/m) - arrowenterprises 19:57:02 01/19/11 Re: Mustang vs dynajet - arrowenterprises 20:03:04 01/19/11 At the end of the day they are just numbers. - nissanguyz32 20:29:28 01/19/11 Re: Numbers. - arrowenterprises 20:48:23 01/19/11 First off you have a NICE car. I have the same turbos as you - nissanguyz32 21:29:23 01/19/11 Re: Numbers - arrowenterprises 21:46:59 01/19/11 Put your car on a dynojet then report back (n/m) - ztunerz 21:45:48 01/19/11 Dynos were developed for tuning purposes. - ZLover4Life 22:12:52 01/19/11 Re: Dynos for tuning purposes. - arrowenterprises 22:24:55 01/19/11 Even if they were the same dyno you wouldn't see the same #s - ZLover4Life 19:22:02 01/20/11 Dyno Dynamics and Mustang dynos are load bearing... - Only1Z 20:31:19 01/19/11 Dynojets can be load bearing like the one at SZ. (n/m) - nissanguyz32 20:39:33 01/19/11 That would be news to me. - Only1Z 22:11:14 01/19/11 just for your reference - nissanguyz32 22:32:34 01/19/11 16% lower numbers on a Dyno Dynamics vs DynoJet - I dynoed - ELIM 22:00:15 01/19/11 Save your money... - Only1Z 22:15:50 01/19/11 Sounds good. Will probably save it for the tune! (n/m) - ELIM 23:18:23 01/19/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.