Subject	I was going to mention that.
Posted by	ni[X]it on December 20, 2010 at 11:46 AM
	This message has been viewed 174 times.
In Reply To	caveat emptor posted by Adam (NoVA) on December 20, 2010 at 11:32 AM
Message	We've had to deal the the NSK problem for years now. Even the certifications we require in aerospace are suspect. We now avoid 'NSK' brand bearings in our service and maintenance areas. Petz #3
Follow Ups	Z1 refurbished idler & tensioner pulleys - ZXoltan 11:04:41 12/20/10 it's from Z1... - KasbeKZ(VA) 11:10:48 12/20/10 Nsk bearings are perfectly acceptable. The important part - ztunerz 11:14:56 12/20/10 Just to clarify, the used components in question are..... - Dustin@Z1 11:20:23 12/20/10 so - Adam (NoVA) 12:00:46 12/20/10 Re: so - Dustin@Z1 13:29:06 12/20/10 Good to know. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 14:11:43 12/20/10 cool - Adam (NoVA) 14:23:18 12/20/10 caveat emptor - Adam (NoVA) 11:32:54 12/20/10 and when i say NKS i mean NSK. (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 11:33:38 12/20/10 That sucks (n/m) - ztunerz 11:34:26 12/20/10 more discussion @ MotoIQ on fake parts in general - Adam (NoVA) 11:36:13 12/20/10 I was going to mention that. - ni[X]it 11:46:35 12/20/10 So has anyone tried the Z1 product yet? (n/m) - ZXoltan 14:52:42 12/20/10 I asked this question a while ago, basically it comes down - JonnyZ(SoCal) 15:41:12 12/20/10 Redoing the work should be the least of your worries - ZXRider 15:49:46 12/20/10 Agreed. That's why I dont want to be the guinea pig ;-) (n/m) - ZXoltan 15:52:43 12/20/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.