Subject	I was estimating 385hp at the crank with 15% loss
Posted by	Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) on November 10, 2010 at 10:56 PM
	This message has been viewed 45 times.
In Reply To	I was just googling around actually posted by Broke_as_**** on November 10, 2010 at 10:18 PM
Message	through the drive train. I'm not really 100% on the difference's on dyno's either. I know there has to be some difference in the types. But from what I've read the mustang dyno reads lower on average than inertial dyno's. It actually simulates the power you have when your on the street.
Follow Ups	Lets play a guessing game. - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 19:33:00 11/10/10 @rw 381.4 (n/m) - ttz'in (NorCal) 19:44:56 11/10/10 339hp (n/m) - tuckz32 19:48:10 11/10/10 365@rw (n/m) - pearlzed(toronto) 19:51:56 11/10/10 328.9 (n/m) - Spddracer 20:06:14 11/10/10 Here it is. Mustang Dyno. - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 20:30:18 11/10/10 Weight: 4002? - Broke_as_**** 20:38:53 11/10/10 lol I have no idea on that one. All the crap i had in the - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 20:43:03 11/10/10 I was just googling around actually - Broke_as_**** 22:18:30 11/10/10 I was estimating 385hp at the crank with 15% loss - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 22:56:06 11/10/10 O yeah. Thats just pulls. The car has hand no tunning - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 20:38:58 11/10/10 Sweet! What did I win? (n/m) - Spddracer 22:12:00 11/10/10 A beer if we ever meet. (n/m) - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 22:39:00 11/10/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.