TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Re: Not accurate? It's 100% accurate, but you're too thick to
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Re: Not accurate? It's 100% accurate, but you're too thick to
     
Posted by Tech@EPR on October 28, 2010 at 11:04 AM
  This message has been viewed 176 times.
     
In Reply To Not accurate? It's 100% accurate, but you're too thick to posted by LitlElvis on October 28, 2010 at 09:37 AM
     
Message To each their own Brett. I've never once said you don't know anything about porting heads but I will also say that mathematics aren't the be all to figuring out outcomes.

Give the benefit of the doubt or not makes no difference. I do what I know works and its continuing to work. I don't need a scientific formula to tell me why something works. Some things just can't be explained and some things can. A large percentage of cylinder head theory is undefinable yet works.

I don't post to do a self promotion what so ever. I post on what I've dealt with and seen personally and deal with on a day to day basis. You make it sound as if I just post to see myself type. I rarely post on this forum to begin with and the only time I really get into a discussion is if someone asks about how to machine or repair a part or on an engine build. Anytime a fuel rail is mentioned or anything that has to do with cam gears or anything you make a variant of you post up. So please don't tell make it out that I come on here to push myself. Its never been the case. I only push my parts in the for sale section. It doesn't bother me that you chime in on your own stuff discussing to others and so forth. More power too you. But please don't be a hypocrite

Explain to me how I think when it comes to cylinder heads? You make it sound like the pot is full on cylinder head theory. Brett cylinder head theory (and thats all its EVER has been and continues to be) is a vast void in the engine building and engineering realm, we are still learning. We try things, they work and we keep moving forward and try to understand why things benefit from what was done. Airflow has no definitive answer. You can't predict it which is why I said its not accurate. The formula may work and be accurate but to what degree? I can calcuate an engines HP by CFM alone but is it accurate?....no its ballpark but not accurate. You're a smart guy Brett and so are numerous other ppl on here but you cant tell me that there is a formula for everything that solidifies the answer to pinpoint X and that be it. Cylinder heads just isn't that way at all. It never will be.

I'm allowed to disagree based on what I feel. Whats wrong in that? What some do in their engines I find wrong and some others may find correct. Nothing wrong there. Its a debate but so many take the debate and push it into a personal attack towards me and start digging up old shit which never has anything to do with the topic of discussion. Overall I wouldn't be in the position I'm in now if what I do with machining and building didn't work. So for whats its worth you have to agree that if its working then I'm right in my own way. Everyone has their thing and theory and belief.

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.