Subject	There's no concrete evidence the '96 made less power. (n/m)
Posted by	FlawleZ (San Antonio) on September 08, 2010 at 8:56 PM
	This message has been viewed 75 times.
In Reply To	Looks a bit on the pricey side.. posted by Draker (Eugene, OR) on September 08, 2010 at 08:45 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Hey guys, havn't been here in ages.. - Josh H.(Boost Whore) 20:39:40 09/08/10 Looks a bit on the pricey side.. - Draker (Eugene, OR) 20:45:10 09/08/10 There's no concrete evidence the '96 made less power. (n/m) - FlawleZ (San Antonio) 20:56:42 09/08/10 well, Draker has a 96 in his Z and Josh lives in CA.. - Halo TTZ 21:26:05 09/08/10 JDM 96 = USpec 95. (n/m) - Draker (Eugene, OR) 21:28:53 09/08/10 good to know. thx (n/m) - Halo TTZ 21:31:48 09/08/10 Well even if it did have 300hp, all the other facts remain. - Draker (Eugene, OR) 21:26:30 09/08/10 They didn't have less peak power... - ZLover4Life 22:07:46 09/08/10 Exactly. (n/m) - HighPsi (NorCal) 23:35:08 09/08/10 Looks like it already has an upgraded ECU. - johnnysombrero 00:50:14 09/09/10 I have a 93 tt for sale... - SFTT 22:00:55 09/08/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.