Subject	Ahhh... Fair enough, that's why I said chassis in my earlier
Posted by	Barry (NJ) on March 11, 2010 at 3:34 PM
	This message has been viewed 23 times.
In Reply To	wasn't disagreeing, just expanding :) (n/m) posted by Guapo on March 11, 2010 at 03:21 PM
Message	post. I figured it encompassed all the changes, as can be seen in the post I added with the pictures. It's hard to find pictures of early and late 260Zs labeled as such.
Follow Ups	While at work today. . . - BBailey(OH) 12:42:27 03/11/10 Looks nice. If they say its for sale, let me know:) (n/m) - J-Mart 12:49:26 03/11/10 *280Z (n/m) - SactoTodd 12:56:38 03/11/10 Could be a late model 260, they changed mid year. (n/m) - Barry (NJ) 13:10:27 03/11/10 It says 260Z on it (n/m) - BBailey(OH) 14:20:46 03/11/10 1974 was a wierd transition year. Early '74 cars had the 240 - Barry (NJ) 14:27:44 03/11/10 bumpers, turn signal locations,etc - Adam (NoVA) 14:39:00 03/11/10 '74's had the thin bumper, but the 280 tail light bezel - Guapo 14:47:21 03/11/10 ok 74.0/74.5 vs. Early 74/Late 74 :P (n/m) - Barry (NJ) 14:58:29 03/11/10 I had an Early '74 myself, wish I still had it or even a pic - Barry (NJ) 15:10:17 03/11/10 wasn't disagreeing, just expanding :) (n/m) - Guapo 15:21:34 03/11/10 Ahhh... Fair enough, that's why I said chassis in my earlier - Barry (NJ) 15:34:08 03/11/10 one day..... (n/m) - Halo Z 17:49:51 03/11/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.