Subject	You must not have much intellectual property
Posted by	bstyleZ on December 02, 2009 at 3:07 PM
	This message has been viewed 231 times.
In Reply To	Are you people serious? posted by 550HPTT on December 02, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Message	If you don't understand why the statement you just made is retarded. If you use someones image to sell something without their permission you can potentially pay exponentially more than if you had just asked them in the first place.
Follow Ups	Shouldn't Kris(SnowmanZ) and I be getting a royalty? lol - LJZTT 02:33:46 12/02/09 Check this post. - JonnyZ(SoCal) 02:47:57 12/02/09 holidays, visit family/friends, went to USC/Clemson game - LJZTT 02:52:35 12/02/09 Sounds like a god time. Good luck on trying to get a - JonnyZ(SoCal) 02:58:38 12/02/09 just to clarify, Kris Snow took the photograph, my sig links - LJZTT 03:07:22 12/02/09 lol, i 'll take it. (n/m) - SuparexTT 09:44:41 12/02/09 Gonna say, I was clearly looking at it. And posted it :) (n/m) - dogpile 12:25:54 12/02/09 You should be honored (n/m) - John@Z1 07:33:58 12/02/09 And Kris should be compensated - BigTDogg (MA) 07:52:48 12/02/09 Correct. He should register the photo (it can be done - Guapo 09:03:26 12/02/09 meh, the calendar is an honor. Other Z owners picked the car - LJZTT 11:08:55 12/02/09 I gotcha and your car looks amazing. (n/m) - John@Z1 13:35:01 12/02/09 I believe it has to have a copyright on it, to protect it. - whitepearl 08:00:29 12/02/09 Here is some of the wording within the law.... - whitepearl 08:06:57 12/02/09 Agreed. - PennStateZ (VB) 08:41:23 12/02/09 The copyright exists on creation. (n/m) - Guapo 09:02:40 12/02/09 If it were my photo... - bstyleZ 09:05:48 12/02/09 I'm confused - awesom-o 10:49:21 12/02/09 my car, the overstock guy was confused (n/m) - LJZTT 11:01:34 12/02/09 Well... - bstyleZ 14:58:10 12/02/09 Re: Well... - awesom-o 15:09:45 12/02/09 try parking two... (n/m) - zgene4 16:08:40 12/02/09 I think he may have just assumed - bstyleZ 18:09:40 12/02/09 Re: I think he may have just assumed - awesom-o 20:29:52 12/02/09 Are you people serious? - 550HPTT 12:04:06 12/02/09 false (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 12:13:23 12/02/09 are YOU serious? (n/m) - Ahmed (Chicago) 12:14:52 12/02/09 You are just so wrong. (n/m) - NytWolf 12:38:33 12/02/09 Negative Ghostrider. (n/m) - Dream Z 13:13:41 12/02/09 FAIL, says Al Gore. - zfreak(Dallas) 13:19:33 12/02/09 .......... and wrong - Tikigod (Denver) 13:21:55 12/02/09 oh how embarrasing for you (n/m) - Guapo 14:02:15 12/02/09 ignorance... (n/m) - maxboost83(WA>OK) 14:07:47 12/02/09 You must not have much intellectual property - bstyleZ 15:07:50 12/02/09 http://www.copyright.gov <-Read (n/m) - turtleboy 15:14:02 12/02/09 LOL - AbsolutZ 16:02:39 12/02/09 lol..whoa open mouth insert foot (n/m) - fst300zx 16:07:36 12/02/09 Some clarification... - DavezTT 16:10:29 12/02/09 >>>>>"LOL"<<<<<<<<<< - LJZTT 17:25:47 12/02/09 dummy (n/m) - Spee 19:08:28 12/02/09 If the photo were copied from a PhotoGraphers site that - 550HPTT 22:01:50 12/02/09 Whoops. - SeedyROM 23:48:37 12/02/09 Wow, you're dumb. - bstyleZ 17:22:21 12/03/09 UPDATE: - zgene4 16:26:39 12/02/09 Actually, the photographer owns copyright to the photos, not - Guapo 16:36:42 12/02/09 You are correct, same goes with wedding pics and kid pics - DavezTT 16:43:06 12/02/09 Yep. Wedding professionals will sign over the rights - Aqualung 00:04:06 12/03/09 exactly - Tikigod (Denver) 17:14:15 12/02/09 this whole thing is being taken far more seriously than it - LJZTT 17:41:12 12/02/09 I agree, but we all learned about copyright law, so it - DavezTT 17:50:34 12/02/09 Being that tt.net is a place where people post pictures ... - NytWolf 18:11:52 12/02/09 Silly or not, Overstock used the photo for commercial use - Guapo 17:51:24 12/02/09 Really? - collegeboy 17:53:18 12/02/09 If you took the photo, yes. (n/m) - Guapo 18:08:54 12/02/09 Everyone loves you and is just trying to protect you. =) (n/m) - ChrisZTT(Sacto, CA) 18:24:10 12/02/09 he can contact Kris very easily through this site or the - LJZTT 17:29:33 12/02/09 Further Update- He's removed the image. (n/m) - bstyleZ 18:03:58 12/02/09 Still should send an invoice along with a screen shot (n/m) - Guapo 18:09:44 12/02/09 Agree - bstyleZ 18:20:13 12/02/09 Good afternoon gentleman, - SnowManZ(rebuilding finally) 18:30:14 12/02/09 you just lost yourself a TON of free publicity, you know - LJZTT 18:42:51 12/02/09 I did not tell them to take it down. How can it be publicity - SnowManZ(rebuilding finally) 18:59:46 12/02/09 Good to hear you're pursuing it. Did you ever get around - Guapo 19:01:41 12/02/09 Yes I did, thanks for asking. Hopefully we can work - SnowManZ(rebuilding finally) 19:19:54 12/02/09 lol I heard that Americans sue left right and centre but man - d_flore 18:51:47 12/02/09 No one is suing anyone. Thanks for your unnecessary comment. (n/m) - SnowManZ(rebuilding finally) 19:01:20 12/02/09 Run the issue by any photography site and see what they - Guapo 19:02:46 12/02/09 Fair Use legislation and copyright protection is FAR... - Black95 21:01:33 12/02/09 Canadians are the kings of Piracy (n/m) - Aqualung 00:07:33 12/03/09 lol, you've never been south of the border have you? (n/m) - LJZTT 00:31:55 12/03/09 As far as Internet Piracy goes, Canada is awesome (n/m) - Aqualung 12:18:18 12/03/09 Yeah I few times, I didnt mean it so seriosusly lol sorry - d_flore 16:35:24 12/03/09 that explains Vuk's business model (n/m) - aliaZ 08:51:22 12/03/09 Nobody said sue. We think LJZTT deserves a nice monitor :~) (n/m) - Aqualung 00:08:50 12/03/09 Then sue :-) (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 16:18:27 12/03/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.