TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - I agree and disagree with that :
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject I agree and disagree with that :
     
Posted by Dark Diver on November 02, 2009 at 5:56 PM
  This message has been viewed 125 times.
     
In Reply To This circuit is incorrect. Details inside... posted by CaliguyPurdue (Selin Design) on November 02, 2009 at 11:34 AM
     
Message First, I want to say that I advised some Z-friends on a foreign forum to buy Jim's translator because 1) it's very accurate and 2) it's the easiest upgraded part to install on a Z.

"This circuit is off by as much as 25% when used to average and as much as 50% when used to add!"
I agree with the 2nd statement : never use this analog circuit to add non linear values. It can't be accurate even with balanced flows.

But in average mode, having a 25% difference with the theoritical value means your flows are really unbalanced and there's a serious turbo/intake/engine problem to fix. Using a dual pop / single MAF would also give a difference in the TP value since only 1 side would be measured.

If you look at the VQ graph - I mean the Flow=f(MAFvoltage) function - it's not a linear function but for similar MAF voltages (say +/- 5%) you can approximate a linear function with a very low error.

And if your MAFs are more than 5% unbalanced, you'll have serious AFR issues : 11.5AFR + 5% = 12.1AFR which is leaner and may have a bad effect on your engine in high load condition.
So I hope all MAFs are accurate and all flows are well balanced +/- 5%. In those conditions, the analog circuit will not give a 25% error.

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.