Subject	Re: Are you sure that's not 5250?
Posted by	jmw23712 on September 05, 2009 at 11:29 AM
	This message has been viewed 100 times.
In Reply To	Are you sure that's not 5250? (n/m) posted by John@Z1 on September 05, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Message	2nd. Looks fine to me.
Follow Ups	Dyno opinions? - Markis 03:51:14 09/05/09 How much boost were you running? - RevTech 04:02:16 09/05/09 94 pump, 18 psi - Markis 04:09:00 09/05/09 Torque curve is broken (n/m) - BobbyT 04:36:08 09/05/09 2nd. Cross over point between HP and torque is way too low. (n/m) - MixManMash 09:56:05 09/05/09 Are you sure that's not 5250? (n/m) - John@Z1 10:31:04 09/05/09 Re: Are you sure that's not 5250? - jmw23712 11:29:14 09/05/09 Crap you're right. I was looking at it worng!!! Must have - MixManMash 11:59:00 09/05/09 What cams are you running? Chances are, the engine that was - MixManMash 09:55:25 09/05/09 Unfortunately the upgrade budget is blown for now, - Markis 12:38:44 09/05/09 I can say that on a hot day, with a stock motor car, - MixManMash 15:20:17 09/05/09 Re: Dyno opinions? (n/m) - Tony90zx 17:18:18 09/05/09 plugs? (n/m) - dream Z (MD) 21:57:13 09/05/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.