Subject	I thought auto's were faster? (n/m)
Posted by	Lady300Z(F&F bound) on June 22, 2001 at 10:11 AM
	This message has been viewed 15 times.
In Reply To	High 13's w/ a stick. Low 14's auto. (n/m) posted by Arnel(njoynmyz.com) on June 22, 2001 at 09:58 AM
Message
Follow Ups	quick ? - mkddoc 09:01:57 06/22/01 10.5 would be pretty damn good. (n/m) - the slow and mild mannered 09:09:44 06/22/01 Re: 10.5 would be pretty damn good. - mkddoc 09:13:01 06/22/01 no, not really. - aZinAZoo 09:15:53 06/22/01 Re: no, not really. - mkddoc 09:17:14 06/22/01 If that's a stock TT at 10.5, ANYBODY SELLING THERES? - MikeM317 (Boston) 09:21:19 06/22/01 Mid to low 14's-1/4mile-avg driver Stock TT with street tire (n/m) - mr. zed line 09:32:20 06/22/01 That's what I thought, high 13s in perfect conditions. (n/m) - MikeM317 (Boston) 09:49:48 06/22/01 ...falling a 1/4 mile down off a cliff! :-) (n/m) - Arnel(njoynmyz.com) 10:49:25 06/22/01 Exactly. Have these guys ever been to a track? (n/m) - Kevin (Jax) 12:31:14 06/22/01 Mid 13's (n/m) - Kevin (Jax) 09:32:03 06/22/01 High 13's w/ a stick. Low 14's auto. (n/m) - Arnel(njoynmyz.com) 09:58:11 06/22/01 I thought auto's were faster? (n/m) - Lady300Z(F&F bound) 10:11:40 06/22/01 This is the *ONLY* exception: When STOCK. (n/m) - Arnel(njoynmyz.com) 10:47:53 06/22/01 Don't you need a torque converter first? - Speaker 11:32:11 06/22/01 No. >> - Arnel(njoynmyz.com) 12:27:55 06/22/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.