Subject	I am down for a GB for sure.
Posted by	thejoneZ (Sacto, CA) on April 18, 2009 at 8:07 PM
	This message has been viewed 87 times.
In Reply To	that price is w/out UEGO, i assume most would want it posted by Medici (NorCal) on April 18, 2009 at 05:26 PM
Message	I will be getting the non-UEGO setup because I plan on using two Innovate LC-1s to monitor both wide bands. The UEGO built into the EMS can only handle one channel anyway, so you would end up having to pick up another UEGO if you wanted to monitor both banks (which I do). Plus, I plan on getting the Serial Gauge to monitor everything, including the LC-1s. Yeeeeeaaa gadgets! :)
Follow Ups	Dual MAF vs. 3 bar MAP - Glide300 13:00:38 04/18/09 Re: Dual MAF vs. 3 bar MAP - ouikikazz 13:08:17 04/18/09 I used to have a map sensor...... - zx299 16:08:15 04/18/09 Re: Dual MAF vs. 3 bar MAP - thejoneZ (Sacto, CA) 17:00:24 04/18/09 that price is w/out UEGO, i assume most would want it - Medici (NorCal) 17:26:10 04/18/09 The AEM system is the ultimate set up. But $$$ (n/m) - phillyz 17:35:03 04/18/09 I am down for a GB for sure. - thejoneZ (Sacto, CA) 20:07:33 04/18/09 I'm running the AEM with a 3.5bar map sensor. - 1badz32 (MN) 21:18:49 04/18/09 Hows that map working out for ya - Glide300 13:56:13 04/19/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.