 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
it's not binding..and the UCC governs transactions btwn... |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
ForceFedTT on March 22, 2009 at 6:27 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 58 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
No offense, but that doesn't make any sense. posted by ZLover4Life on March 22, 2009 at 06:02 PM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
merchants and non-merchants. If I remember correctly, generally, a written offer by a merchant is deemed a "firm offer" and must be held open for the time stated in the offer or no more than 30days. However, this seems more like a contract issue regarding a mistake or, more particularly, a transcription error, aka "scrivener's error." Here, if 240 had reason to believe that this was an error, he will not be entitled to the mistaken terms--in this case, the $100 figure. If Coz copied a catalogue number instead of a price, then 240 probably had a duty to inquire further about the apparent mistake. The firm offer, in this case, therefore would not be enforced.
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
