TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - I didn't know that
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject I didn't know that
     
Posted by jschrauwen on March 10, 2009 at 3:12 PM
  This message has been viewed 87 times.
     
In Reply To Fine, here's my take posted by ZEngineer on March 10, 2009 at 02:53 PM
     
Message I was under the belief that the use of glass on hedlights was deemed to be a liability in accidents. It has since been discontinued by manufacturers on the recommendations of transport reports and legislations - I believe.
The fact that a form of plastic has been substituted was probably decided to be the more prudent move. The early 90's headlights did suffer from yellowing and hazing and I believe that that sort of issue is not present in todays headlight covers. I can only imagine that it's due in part to the improvements made in the last 15 or so years in the plastic and composite industry. You as an engineer should know that.
If glass is so much better, why is it no longer a common use in the auto industry? I believe glass to be a lot more durable than plastic in some regards but then again, plastics won't shatter like glass either.
Like I mentioned before. Andy is offering an option that can improve our lighting situation. I would think there would have been more purposefull questions WRT the lighting aspect rather than getting hung up on the material used. As long as it does the job and is durable enough, who gives a ***** what it's made of or what it's called. The bottom line is lighting improvement. Why is that so difficult for people to grasp?

1990 TT
491.0 RWHP, 476.1 RWTQ, 18 PSI, 94 octane
26PSI w/Race gas = ???

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.