Subject	Re: Since we are on this subject...
Posted by	flashstar on February 03, 2009 at 5:14 PM
	This message has been viewed 47 times.
In Reply To	Since we are on this subject... posted by stickeefingerz (cali) on February 03, 2009 at 05:08 PM
Message	Probably 1/3 of the original production numbers.
Follow Ups	Question re: Z32 Sales numbers - toyz 14:38:04 02/03/09 2003? or 1993? - TriniTT 14:40:18 02/03/09 OOPS! Yes, I meant 1993 and 1994! (n/m) - toyz 15:46:44 02/03/09 In part the exchange rate becoming increasingly unfavorable. - Bernie (NoVA) 16:12:40 02/03/09 Clearly a lesson learned. (n/m) - TriniTT 17:13:21 02/03/09 good points... (n/m) - nemo1080 (Iowa) 17:25:07 02/03/09 The increase in exchange rate was from the US - Spongerider :) 19:24:24 02/03/09 ^^ Very good summary. (n/m) - Inzane 12:27:20 02/04/09 Since we are on this subject... - stickeefingerz (cali) 17:08:24 02/03/09 Re: Since we are on this subject... - flashstar 17:14:11 02/03/09 I wonder if the DOT can give us a real number (n/m) - CaliguyPurdue (redesigning) 18:15:27 02/03/09 less in Japan - zfreak(Dallas) 19:13:22 02/03/09 Re: Question re: Z32 Sales numbers - russ29 19:35:12 02/03/09 This is out of a Z book/Flyer I picked up a few years ago - Spddracer 20:32:59 02/03/09 according to that chart, in '79, ~9 Zs were produced an hour - nemo1080 (Iowa) 20:51:50 02/03/09 I bought my car in '93, looked at a lot of Zs. - not4resaleZ 22:07:31 02/03/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.