Subject	Performance? No.
Posted by	Fast300 on October 25, 2008 at 3:10 AM
	This message has been viewed 77 times.
In Reply To	I'm not sure I follow your 350Z logic. The 240Z offered posted by Dave N on October 24, 2008 at 08:05 PM
Message	The 240 was much cheaper and vastly slower than all of the Corvettes of it's time. The Z32 was NOT much cheaper and vastly slower than the Corvette of it's time, except fot the ZR1s.
Follow Ups	Shoot me now, the 370Z looks to be keeping the ugly. - 5280Z_nightstalker 14:45:43 10/24/08 Thus proving why I hate MT magazine. No substance to their - Dave N 15:18:43 10/24/08 I guess we can be happy we all own the last true great Z (n/m) - 5280Z_nightstalker 15:25:16 10/24/08 *only (n/m) - LJZTT 15:48:43 10/24/08 Don't dismiss the S30 - for if it weren't for that car, we - Dave N 15:59:12 10/24/08 relative to the sportscar climate at the time? - LJZTT 16:07:09 10/24/08 I'm not sure I follow your 350Z logic. The 240Z offered - Dave N 20:05:51 10/24/08 Performance? No. - Fast300 03:10:56 10/25/08 The S30 (I still own one) changed sports cars forever - Got Z? 23:36:04 10/24/08 Visited with a service manager at a local Nissan dealer - 300twinz (satx) 16:29:14 10/24/08 Supercharger? - MixManMash 16:42:45 10/24/08 looks like subtle changes to the exterior. Some LED's (n/m) - XTZ 19:23:18 10/24/08 Useless commentary. (n/m) - rojoloco (San Diego) 23:57:44 10/24/08 The 370Z: another good reason to hang on to your Z32. (n/m) - 240Z FeO2 14:04:08 10/25/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.