Subject	Any idea why they went so small? I've heard...
Posted by	Mike B (Houston) on June 12, 2001 at 12:25 AM
	This message has been viewed 14 times.
In Reply To	2.25" according to the Nismo catalog... (n/m) posted by WOTZ on June 11, 2001 at 11:36 PM
Message	Any idea why they went so small? I've heard Borla was a higher end exhuast system. At least I thought that when I dished out over a grand for the cat back system. Can anyone justify only 2.25" pipes? Mike Butler 1991 300ZXTT Automatic - SGP Stage VI+ (Currently awaiting Engine Overhaul) ICQ# 32155440 - Work
Follow Ups	Is Borla catback 2 1/4 or 2 1/2 inch? - RegalZ 23:11:01 06/11/01 2.25" according to the Nismo catalog... (n/m) - WOTZ 23:36:45 06/11/01 Any idea why they went so small? I've heard... - Mike B (Houston) 00:25:22 06/12/01 Dude, I love the sig! (n/m) - Kevin (Jax) 12:34:27 06/12/01 Borla says that it is 2 1/4" OD. Performance detriment? (n/m) - regbike 07:50:49 06/12/01 I measured mine before installation, it was 2 1/2" (n/m) - Kevin (Jax) 12:33:36 06/12/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.