Subject	TT wings are nice...
Posted by	IsZGone on June 10, 2001 at 9:29 AM
	This message has been viewed 17 times.
In Reply To	Best looking wing for a 2+2? posted by Jackie Chan on June 10, 2001 at 09:10 AM
Message	I've got a wing from 95 TT on my 92 2+2.. It looks pretty nice, but after seeing it day in and day out, I think it throws the visual balance off just a bit.. In my opinion the early "ducktail" style TT wings look the best. Sorry these pics are so bad. I haven't gotten a digital camera yet so these are vidcaps from my 8mm HandyCam. Andrew Janeshek jnshk@aol.com 1992 NA 2+2 http://members.aol.com/jnshk/
Follow Ups	Best looking wing for a 2+2? - Jackie Chan 09:10:40 06/10/01 TT wings are nice... - IsZGone 09:29:41 06/10/01 Hey IsZGone, quick question>> - zx spinner 13:33:24 06/10/01 Roads here (Chas. WV) are terrible... - IsZGone 09:25:53 06/11/01 gracer/WW mid wing, or either kaminari - Jjzx 09:45:30 06/10/01 Stillen Turbo-like spoiler on 2+2... - Daniel ZX 09:49:25 06/10/01 I personally like the TT wing, '94 + version. link inside >> - AshsZ (In Florida) 09:51:10 06/10/01 99 oem - 3 double-0 ZX 15:24:36 06/10/01 oops. not bashing the 94 style. just forgot to click back =P (n/m) - 3 double-0 ZX 15:25:56 06/10/01 Don't flame me for this, but >>>> - timz 10:22:49 06/10/01 just wondering, what's up with the u/d pulley? (n/m) - Daniel ZX 10:32:15 06/10/01 I love the hp gain of the u/d pulley but >>> - timz 10:44:21 06/10/01 I see, thanks. (n/m) - Daniel ZX 10:52:56 06/10/01 Have U measured it on a Z engine specifically? - Good2Zya 11:14:39 06/10/01 I guess you have never read my post on this topic last time - timz 11:32:31 06/10/01 Umm...no, it is rubber mounted (n/m) - safZ 12:42:14 06/10/01 i agree, just not with that wing. stillen type 1 or - dogpile 10:37:49 06/10/01 Everyone has to be a "rice boy" once a while. LOL! (n/m) - timz 10:46:22 06/10/01 I agree, I had one on my 2+2 also. (n/m) - BAD TT Z32® 14:09:25 06/10/01 Mine is DOPE! - BooZTT (Hawaii) 11:52:46 06/10/01 how about strosek?? - CRVTKLR[phx] 16:49:28 06/10/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.