Subject	my thoughts
Posted by	gt300zxtt on June 02, 2008 at 1:09 AM
	This message has been viewed 116 times.
In Reply To	sure did posted by spyhunterTT(nj) on June 01, 2008 at 09:16 PM
Message	much much quicker revving increase in hp due to decrease in sprung weight (like lightweight crank pulley, rotors, etc.: engine does not have to work as hard to turn drivetrain) stock flywheel can warp/wear, causing your friction disc to wear quicker with rps segmented, no problems with cracking or warping with much abuse, before and after swap cons: revs drop much quicker, sometimes too quick price
Follow Ups	cheap flywheel! - poxcr 17:51:51 06/01/08 i would like to see that kind of price cut for the rps - gt300zxtt 18:10:36 06/01/08 It's cheaper on the 3zc store, and my soul is dying - en5 18:26:51 06/01/08 because the source is the same (n/m) - genic 19:24:07 06/01/08 stay stock, there isn't much of a gain going to al (n/m) - spyhunterTT(nj) 19:01:49 06/01/08 False. (n/m) - my91z 19:34:38 06/01/08 Did you have one before the swap? (n/m) - Briscoe'sZ32 (NJ) 20:14:41 06/01/08 sure did - spyhunterTT(nj) 21:16:52 06/01/08 Thanks. (n/m) - Briscoe'sZ32 (NJ) 21:20:11 06/01/08 my thoughts - gt300zxtt 01:09:57 06/02/08 but the increase in power is something like - spyhunterTT(nj) 05:36:58 06/02/08 It was easliy the best mod I did when I was NA > - my91z 09:14:15 06/02/08 puck clutches engauge very quickly and - spyhunterTT(nj) 17:13:04 06/02/08 It's an NA. Nothing will. Might as well make it more fun. (n/m) - Guapo 20:42:18 06/02/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.