Subject	OBD-II and no VVT (n/m)
Posted by	Waggz on May 10, 2008 at 11:38 PM
	This message has been viewed 136 times.
In Reply To	1996 twin turbo posted by fairladyz90999 on May 10, 2008 at 11:29 PM
Message
Follow Ups	1996 twin turbo - fairladyz90999 23:29:24 05/10/08 they're not (n/m) - ZEngineer (Dallas next month) 23:33:20 05/10/08 Yes they are. (n/m) - sorka 23:41:26 05/10/08 Yes they are. (n/m) - zfreak(Denver) 00:32:45 05/11/08 Yes they are. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 03:35:35 05/11/08 I'd exchange a couple of HP for 6 less years of wear (n/m) - ZEngineer (Dallas next month) 11:40:58 05/11/08 The issue is larger then just a "couple of HP" (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 11:57:45 05/11/08 fine, fine. I concede. :) (n/m) - ZEngineer (Dallas next month) 12:03:52 05/11/08 I just replace the things that wear out with new :) (n/m) - Piranha(AZ) 13:30:58 05/11/08 Re: I'd exchange a couple of HP for 6 less years of wear (n/ - Cade(PA) 13:59:39 05/11/08 Suede began in '92, so that's rather moot. (n/m) - TriniTT 20:55:18 05/11/08 Yes they are. (n/m) - ThunderZ 08:35:25 05/11/08 yes they are. (n/m) - Spee 12:16:10 05/11/08 The OBD-II Computer (n/m) - Seb (specialty-Z) 23:37:20 05/10/08 What exactly does that mean as far as power goes? (n/m) - fairladyz90999 23:39:33 05/10/08 Re: What exactly does that mean as far as power goes? - Seb (specialty-Z) 23:42:48 05/10/08 Also true for a '95? (n/m) - zoom 15:09:23 05/11/08 no (n/m) - ali300zx 15:19:03 05/11/08 so can one swap a OBD II with OBD I? (n/m) - zyoulater 15:39:04 05/11/08 you could so to speak "downgrade" - Seb (specialty-Z) 17:55:04 05/11/08 OBD-II and no VVT (n/m) - Waggz 23:38:01 05/10/08 Nissan calls it VTC, not VVT. - Fast300 00:34:29 05/11/08 yes. - Waggz 00:52:38 05/11/08 What are you basing your question on? - z_man300 01:30:11 05/11/08 I paid more for my '92 than asking prices of '96s - sorka 01:44:04 05/11/08 Re: I paid more for my '92 than asking prices of '96s - z_man300 01:55:23 05/11/08 All things being equal.... - sorka 02:41:12 05/11/08 Re: All things being equal.... - z_man300 23:52:14 05/11/08 KBB values FWIW - ZCulture 10:10:29 05/11/08 KBB is not reliable for Z values. (n/m) - not-hrz 10:35:03 05/11/08 KBB does not reflect true value of Z. - sorka 10:41:52 05/11/08 Your single data point definitely doesn't. - ZCulture 10:52:18 05/11/08 You're wrong. (n/m) - sorka 16:45:18 05/11/08 2nd. (n/m) - TriniTT 20:59:37 05/11/08 3rd (n/m) - Evan(CA) 21:20:11 05/11/08 That's what I love... - z_man300 23:49:13 05/11/08 thats not accurate at all (n/m) - AntiHero 13:37:51 05/11/08 People buy high mile cars like that? (n/m) - SactoTodd 17:20:27 05/11/08 Well, I sold my '93 Slicktop TT for $12k. - TriniTT 21:00:44 05/11/08 From owning a 96, I can tell you it is less desirable. - apudapus 11:20:10 05/11/08 They're not unless you're building a drag racer/dyno queen - ZCulture 10:16:26 05/11/08 Re: They're not unless you're building a drag racer/dyno que - Cade(PA) 14:40:48 05/11/08 Re: Re: They're not unless you're building a drag racer/dyno que - z_man300 23:19:52 05/11/08 stock vs stock is there a noticable difference between the - fairladyz90999 15:53:56 05/11/08 Re: stock vs stock is there a noticable difference between the - z_man300 23:40:52 05/11/08 OBD no VTC... but.. last year made.. so its subjective (n/m) - z_samurai 16:21:05 05/11/08 Re: 1996 twin turbo - darkmann 21:50:38 05/11/08 And 20 less hp as dynos have proved time and again. (n/m) - sorka 22:18:11 05/11/08 You know, you should really stick to facts... - z_man300 23:14:39 05/11/08 Why don't you cite one? Here's one that proves otherwise. - ZCulture 23:18:56 05/11/08 You're kidding, right? - z_man300 23:23:03 05/11/08 I didn't reply to you. My post is showing a '96 TT - ZCulture 23:32:11 05/11/08 Dangit! Sorry :) - z_man300 23:37:47 05/11/08 Actually, - z_man300 00:02:58 05/12/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.