| Message |
At least that happens with the non-provisional and from what I'm reading on the PP, there isn't a specific difference in how the opposing companies lawyers can handle the motions. It'd be very easy for me, knowing the little amount that I do, to keep it rotating through the courts and hearings long enough to reap the profit, milk the market and get out. At worst, with a settlement. Even so, neither of us are lawyers and really don't have a lot of say in this. If you're taking yours seriously, you really should speak with an IP lawyer before proceeding. Definitely good to know where you stand being a business owner. Maybe, just maybe it'd slow down a shadetree mechanic looking to make a blatant knock-off of something brand new, but do we really have that problem in this scene? I do like that you're trying new things and at least looking into this stuff, but your wall of text and paragraph every sentence format makes it feel like fluff. Fluff that you'd email to the vendors/innovators if it really could help and mattered rather than posting here. T(Seattle) said it best I think.
 
Avoid Z1 Motorsports - Hacked our forum to delete years of proof about service complaints, questionable ethics and lies about inventing products.
Avoid AMS Products - Killing Z32 product innovation, one quickly copied Chinese part at a time.
SoCalZCrew.com - On a more positive note, come find out how we do it in the West!
|
 |
