| Why is it that when I release a 2.5" piping kit that you balk at the non apples to apples comparisons Because the comparison was bullshit, and you know it. (as was deemed as such by you and others) You know as well as everyone else that you're being disingenuous when you pretend adding multiple components then touting the performance benefits of just one of the variables is legitimate proof of increased performance. but when TOM comes out with a 2.5" intake piping and NO testing performed by himself that no one even questions the performance of his product? Separate issue entirely. The recommendation of T0m's product over yours is because there's a market demand for it, regardless of justification and he's a better, more reliable vendor than you are. Is there a performance increase? Yes. Did your "add a bunch of mods to a car, along with my pipes" test prove it? Not even close. Certainly nobody is using your flawed testing methodology to sell his product. What are you guys that disputed my testing basing your recommendation of TOMs pipes on? The recommendation is to use T0m as a vendor, because you are unreliable and your product is overpriced. I dont really need an answer from you on this Deep down, you do. You really do. - I've known for a long time that you and several others just have hard-ons for giving me a hard time..But do you realize how it makes you guys look to the rest of the members that read this forum? It makes us look like dicks to everyone who worships the ground you walk on, and reasonable to everyone else. Where is TOMs testing on his 2.5" pipes? Where is a legitimate version of your test?
Where are the pipes your customers have been waiting months for?
Why do yours costs almost double what T0m's cost?
Why are you wasting time on TT.Net trolling for customers and debating moot topics instead of delivering on promises you made last year to customers who have already paid in advance?
Recursively Yours,
Kenny...
PETZ Member #5
You guys rock socks. (Click for pie-chart)
Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes.
- EW Dijkstra
|
