Subject	Re: Why do you consider the 555cc's a bad idea?
Posted by	vect0rx on November 27, 2007 at 11:16 AM
	This message has been viewed 106 times.
In Reply To	Why do you consider the 555cc's a bad idea? (n/m) posted by ZCulture on November 27, 2007 at 11:14 AM
Message	well the mindset at the time was with a shop that's since gone out of business. But my car was boosting 9.5 and I got the 96 JWT ECU and was only managing like 11psi out of it when I had read left and right that it was supposed to hit ~13-13.5 (tried all different sizes of welding tips), so my reasoning to the best I can remember was to help rectify this problem somehow. But I don't really need them at this stage of upgrading, do I?
Follow Ups	have had my 96TT for 8 years thinking future - vect0rx 11:05:08 11/27/07 depending on ur power goals - Alan(NJ) 11:13:05 11/27/07 Re: depending on ur power goals - vect0rx 11:25:28 11/27/07 Look at sport500s - ben7021 11:34:48 11/27/07 Re: Look at sport500s - vect0rx 11:38:07 11/27/07 You'd get better boost and less lag - Keaner 11:49:57 11/27/07 "Closer to 2000 than 3000" - ben7021 15:49:39 11/27/07 Hmm, I guess it makes sense w/ the downpipes, - Keaner 16:20:34 11/27/07 I had a similar set to the GT600R - Keaner 10:19:01 11/28/07 Why do you consider the 555cc's a bad idea? (n/m) - ZCulture 11:14:20 11/27/07 Re: Why do you consider the 555cc's a bad idea? - vect0rx 11:16:23 11/27/07 With better turbos, yes you do - Keaner 11:27:37 11/27/07 Re: With better turbos, yes you do - vect0rx 11:29:52 11/27/07 iirc stock turbos hit a wall at 18 psi - Barry'z (NJ) 11:36:12 11/27/07 Re: iirc stock turbos hit a wall at 18 psi - vect0rx 11:39:20 11/27/07 Exactly, and you'll have it if/when you decide you want more (n/m) - Barry'z (NJ) 11:53:02 11/27/07 Ah, then the 555s should hold you for a while. - Keaner 11:38:05 11/27/07 I'd try to fix any boost leaks and go with a good EBC - Barry'z (NJ) 11:32:19 11/27/07 2nd on both counts (n/m) - vorpalZ 11:49:29 11/27/07 Well, the boosting issue is orthogonal to injectors. - ZCulture 11:35:04 11/27/07 orthogonal, nice word ;~) (n/m) - Barry'z (NJ) 11:43:28 11/27/07 orthogonal • adjective-of or involving right angles; at - 240Z FeO2 12:54:16 11/27/07 not in this case, "statistically independent" - fourZero 13:24:45 11/27/07 Really? I think it's a literary use of 'orthogonal' in the - 240Z FeO2 15:48:42 11/27/07 Well... - Barry'z (NJ) 16:03:40 11/27/07 That's more like it... See if I rely on the Oxford English - 240Z FeO2 19:07:44 11/27/07 1st off all your injectors are 615cc, 2nd there is a reason - Bernie (NoVA) 11:51:30 11/27/07 Ok, heres a question.... - Keaner 11:54:40 11/27/07 He better not make that list coz it'll be a very long one. (n/m) - ZCulture 11:59:05 11/27/07 Exactly my point! (n/m) - Keaner 12:01:28 11/27/07 Newer style "555" injectors actually flow @ 615cc - call JWT - Bernie (NoVA) 12:52:03 11/27/07 Wow, didnt know that. - Keaner 13:21:20 11/27/07 EBC suggestions? - vect0rx 11:43:00 11/27/07 Blitz SBC-iD - vorpalZ 11:51:32 11/27/07 2nd. :) - MixManMash 12:58:11 11/27/07 :waves: (n/m) - vorpalZ 13:56:18 11/27/07 3rd (n/m) - sfarrah 15:05:46 11/27/07 i would skip on the sport 600's. There - moxie (SF) 12:44:47 11/27/07 What would you recommend? - RICH1 13:39:26 11/27/07 530s, or GT600R, as mentioned above, cheaper and better (n/m) - Keaner 13:49:44 11/27/07 GT600r's are the turbo's I'd like to get when mine die. - Jason300zxTT 15:35:13 11/27/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.