Subject	my valves are designed for better flow at low lift too
Posted by	maglito on November 21, 2007 at 11:27 PM
	This message has been viewed 54 times.
In Reply To	I'm not sure I understand why you did the oversized valves posted by Scotts94z32 on November 21, 2007 at 01:36 PM
Message	Isn't the difference in the details of the 400+ vs 500 cam -- cam profile? I was mostly just busting you about this whole over played 400+ vs. 500 cam deal. m a g l i t o SGP engine destroyed itself after 4k miles. New engine dropped in 11/05/2006. Details coming soon. sig photo by me effects by ZXRider(SoCal) The build up begins - progress - reassembly part one - part two Hallett (MayFast2004) - Road America (OctoberFast2004) -- \/ \/ comparisons/options/thoughts \/ \/ -- headlights and exhausts - wheels - tires - heads + manifolds 2005 Downshift calender photoshoot
Follow Ups	JWT CAM and idle audio/video clips - WazTTed 03:48:16 11/21/07 between the 400+ and 500's.. there isn't - Kong ZTT GT28RS MD 06:45:15 11/21/07 That's because you know 500 is where it's AT. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 11:07:24 11/21/07 power under the curve... (n/m) - maglito 12:07:48 11/21/07 I'm not sure I understand why you did the oversized valves - Scotts94z32 13:36:04 11/21/07 my valves are designed for better flow at low lift too - maglito 23:27:16 11/21/07 Re: my valves are designed for better flow at low lift too - WazTTed 02:02:08 11/22/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.