Subject	well, I knew they were slow
Posted by	Elguapo (Work) on May 31, 2001 at 9:32 AM
	This message has been viewed 15 times.
In Reply To	you didn't know that? Why do you think they get ragged on >> posted by my91z(5.0 Killer) on May 31, 2001 at 09:31 AM
Message	I knew they had around 220 but heavy and a lot of drivetrain loss, but I didn't know they had a version with that little HP.
Follow Ups	Mitsubishi 3000GT - Really FWD??? - drp 08:33:09 05/31/01 Yes it is. So is the Dodge Stealth. (n/m) - aZinAZoo 08:40:27 05/31/01 but the stealth does have the cool - Ste?myZ(ZtoyZ.NET©) 13:48:10 05/31/01 look at the engine orientation it can only be FWD (n/m) - Ron (Houston) 08:43:05 05/31/01 Here are the specs - Zphoria 08:46:14 05/31/01 holy shift! 97-99 GT has only 161 HP? (n/m) - Elguapo (Work) 08:52:38 05/31/01 yeah there really heavy too - o Mgriz o 09:08:18 05/31/01 you didn't know that? Why do you think they get ragged on >> - my91z(5.0 Killer) 09:31:00 05/31/01 well, I knew they were slow - Elguapo (Work) 09:32:25 05/31/01 yup, slugs hehe (n/m) - my91z(5.0 Killer) 09:33:46 05/31/01 AWDs (VR4) are actually "front wheel drive with rear assist" (n/m) - Kez43 08:55:15 05/31/01 3000 G-arbage T-ruck Nuff said! (n/m) - NA300ZX (TPA, FL) 10:30:02 05/31/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.