Subject	Re: Dood. Now that it is available, it is the common sense t
Posted by	tdogzjoint on November 09, 2007 at 4:22 AM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	Dood. Now that it is available, it is the common sense thing posted by ENVYMYZ on November 09, 2007 at 03:09 AM
Message	It would not seem so, do people get an OD pulley for their alternator because it's producing .10 less volts, or how bout one for the a/c compressor too; the truth is that the difference is negligible. There are many other variables that would make more of a difference. As long as the temp is in the normal operating range, why bother.
Follow Ups	which underdrive pulleys to go with??? - john90zxtt 19:42:23 11/08/07 just go with the ams ud/od pulley or ASP ud and - ali300zx 19:51:46 11/08/07 Re: which underdrive pulleys to go with??? - c300zxs 20:08:12 11/08/07 Depends on your budget, but the OD pulley is a must. - AbsolutZ (OH) 20:24:00 11/08/07 Why is the water pump pulley a "must"? - Broke_as_**** 20:47:35 11/08/07 agreed, mine has been fine for 3 years (n/m) - blacksc 20:49:30 11/08/07 Running an underdrive pulley without the overdrive pulley - Guapo 20:51:21 11/08/07 Problem being - Broke_as_**** 21:00:17 11/08/07 You can be running hotter than optimal and you wouldn't - Guapo 21:33:24 11/08/07 Bleh, "optimal", what a subjective word - Broke_as_**** 00:16:19 11/09/07 Dood. Now that it is available, it is the common sense thing - ENVYMYZ 03:09:31 11/09/07 Did you even read anything I wrote? - Broke_as_**** 03:54:12 11/09/07 yep, and you're wrong (n/m) - Guapo 08:36:11 11/09/07 And yet, you have no proof of that whatsoever - Broke_as_**** 11:56:58 11/09/07 Guapo is right. Please read the links? - Spongerider :) 12:07:25 11/09/07 I have - Broke_as_**** 12:20:55 11/09/07 What I was getting at was your comment about a - Spongerider :) 12:26:17 11/09/07 He is right, it just doesn't make a difference... (n/m) - tdogzjoint 12:33:53 11/09/07 Re: Dood. Now that it is available, it is the common sense t - tdogzjoint 04:22:48 11/09/07 For a track driven car, even occasional, it's a must - BigTDogg (MA) 14:48:43 11/09/07 I guess saying "must" was a huge thorn. - AbsolutZ (OH) 21:47:12 11/08/07 Uh... - Broke_as_**** 00:25:46 11/09/07 Plus, who knows.. - prelewd 00:36:45 11/09/07 "wink wink" (n/m) - prelewd 00:38:32 11/09/07 I agree with you. I do not find fault with anyone who - robo (sebring1970) 08:06:29 11/09/07 "benefits from it are unproven to this point." - Spongerider :) 12:02:11 11/09/07 I believe he was getting at - Broke_as_**** 12:12:22 11/09/07 I'm surprise that as a performance minded person on this - Spongerider :) 12:23:29 11/09/07 So... - Broke_as_**** 12:31:18 11/09/07 Never mind about my post above I was talking to - Spongerider :) 13:27:34 11/09/07 I don't have much to add. Seedy did show some - robo (sebring1970) 13:44:26 11/09/07 A cooler engine performs - Spongerider :) 15:29:37 11/09/07 That's a very broad statement - Broke_as_**** 17:31:10 11/09/07 That's a very broad statement - Guapo 19:44:26 11/09/07 Exactly - Broke_as_**** 19:59:19 11/09/07 optimal = returns cooling to stock levels. - Guapo 21:28:19 11/09/07 Yes because stock is always perfect isn't it? - Broke_as_**** 00:40:45 11/10/07 It's maybe not a "must", but it's not a bad idea either. - jmw23712 20:54:04 11/08/07 No, it's not a bad idea - Broke_as_**** 21:01:34 11/08/07 My thoughts: - AbsolutZ (OH) 21:36:53 11/08/07 Round Robin - LoqueZX(CA) 21:55:02 11/08/07 No doubt. - AbsolutZ (OH) 22:15:13 11/08/07 Re: which underdrive pulleys to go with??? - Guapo 20:52:52 11/08/07 I like the AMS UD and OD pully setup. - Tim B. 21:14:03 11/08/07 Ams Ud and OD pulley no doubt, perform and look great! (n/m) - PearlZX 21:57:40 11/08/07 2nd. Love mine. - JaYbOmBz 08:06:40 11/09/07 This may seem obvious but it is VERY important that the - Russell@Z1 21:20:16 11/08/07 2nd....good point (n/m) - Atl300zxTT 06:44:08 11/09/07 timing is everything (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 07:59:30 11/09/07 the light one (n/m) - Josef(Houston) 23:15:44 11/08/07 Alt/PS pulleys coming soon.... - Vuk@Absolute Motorsports Inc. 08:34:18 11/09/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.