| Message |
I'm going to have to use that for some of the hardcore, Z32-owns-all leghumpers running around here. It may be proven, but seems like living in the past to be going around boasting 1990 performance data and making comparisons with it in the year 2007. It's just unrealistic. A stock 1990 Z32 is going to perform worse today, just because of the test of time. Whatever, I'm done debating. I think you kind of missed my point here, so I'm just going to tag out.
 -Brad
1992 Z32 2+2 NA
1996 B14 SE-R
1986 Z31 Coupe NA (For Sale)
________________________ Rule #1: It's just a car. "It's your car, do what you want." "SOunds like your spoiled." - Nis300owner on May 18, 2007 at 2:27 PM
"...when i've been in florida, people drive crazy, dangerous, and fast." - ARA300ZX on January 10, 2007 at 12:06 PM
"You were 100% correct." - Kenny on October 10, 2006 at 1:15 PM
"2+2s must be carnivorous. Right Brad?" - Barry'z (NJ) on July 29, 2006 at 11:39 PM
"car or kitten... ill kick the crap out of it!" - VG30DE racer on July 14, 2006 at 3:45 PM
"They turn their head because the 2+2 is sooo long." - ZJeweler(ssm300z) on July 13, 2006 at 4:43 PM
"The Z was meant for the track, not the dragstrip." - Moxie on May 01, 2006 at 3:03 PM
"Let me brake the news to all those ignorant old folks in this forum." - nightriderZ on July 14, 2005 at 2:33 AM
"...Stage III does require an ECU upgrade MORAN..." - djtz1 on June 29, 2005 at 3:34 PM |
 |
| Follow Ups |
|
|
