Subject	btw the connection to the det sensor was off
Posted by	BannonZ (Thebanman407) on August 08, 2007 at 9:29 PM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	Read my post foo. (n/m) posted by BannonZ (Thebanman407) on August 08, 2007 at 09:19 PM
Message	Tightened it up and the code went away. Very happy with 55. :)
Follow Ups	Excellent - BannonZ (Thebanman407) 20:46:46 08/08/07 they look great! What's the width? (n/m) - ben_96_slicktop 20:49:48 08/08/07 8 in the front and 8.5 in the back - BannonZ (Thebanman407) 20:54:27 08/08/07 Post some pics without the wheel turned when you do. - ChicagoTT 20:54:20 08/08/07 I will tomorow in the light, I was just snapping those as - BannonZ (Thebanman407) 20:55:42 08/08/07 *shrug* They look great on a car with no boost :-P - Dave N 21:14:07 08/08/07 Read my post foo. (n/m) - BannonZ (Thebanman407) 21:19:27 08/08/07 btw the connection to the det sensor was off - BannonZ (Thebanman407) 21:29:49 08/08/07 Nice! 16 pounds? Sweet. - BradZ (FL) 21:22:51 08/08/07 When we gets a peak? (n/m) - BannonZ (Thebanman407) 21:37:12 08/08/07 When I actually have time... - BradZ (FL) 21:47:15 08/08/07 do you need adjustable camber in the fronts for that? - CRAZZEPETE. 11:13:39 08/09/07 No, not really. - BradZ (FL) 13:56:28 08/09/07 uneven pavement? or is there really that much wheel gap? (n/m) - LJZTT 22:35:59 08/08/07 prob the pavement.I found a pic of BannonZ's Z tommorow - whatsthegoodword 22:46:55 08/08/07 figured so, they do suit the car pretty well (n/m) - LJZTT 23:10:16 08/08/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.