Subject	Damn, I actually agree with Jack... :/ (n/m)
Posted by	ZX NAT (Dallas) on May 24, 2001 at 10:09 PM
	This message has been viewed 14 times.
In Reply To	Its not just about weight savings. posted by Jack B. on May 24, 2001 at 09:50 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Has NE1 ever "customly made" a slicktop TT 2+2? hehe - ZX NAT (Dallas) 20:56:00 05/24/01 Re: Has NE1 ever "customly made" a slicktop TT 2+2? hehe - Cinzy (Reds Rule) 21:21:45 05/24/01 How would one go about making a 2+2 slicktop? (n/m) - Nion (June '71 240Z) 21:25:04 05/24/01 two cars, one saw. (i believe). was there a 2+2 slick? (n/m) - niXit(da][as) 21:27:51 05/24/01 no, but heres how it could be done> - ZX NAT (Dallas) 21:37:10 05/24/01 haha if only it were that easy........>>> - Cinzy (Reds Rule) 21:40:37 05/24/01 Its not just about weight savings. - Jack B. 21:50:33 05/24/01 Re: Its not just about weight savings. - Cinzy (Reds Rule) 21:54:30 05/24/01 I wouldnt do it - Jack B. 21:57:22 05/24/01 Re: I wouldnt do it - Cinzy (Reds Rule) 22:29:20 05/24/01 Damn, I actually agree with Jack... :/ (n/m) - ZX NAT (Dallas) 22:09:15 05/24/01 Wouldnt save any weight. Slicktop roof isnt where savings> - Xi0nX4 (ohio) 15:33:27 05/25/01 Wont fit. Arch of the roof line is different. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:57:42 05/24/01 The idea of converting from T-tops to slicktop keeps boiling - Arturo C. 12:14:50 05/25/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.