Subject	Hmm, I thought that was bringing George out in public. (n/m)
Posted by	Scotts94z32 on June 21, 2007 at 3:50 PM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	I think its considered "rude" not necessarily illegal (n/m) posted by dpjax on June 21, 2007 at 03:13 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Any one know if SpeedyZX has seen or approved of this? - CRAZZEPETE. 13:37:07 06/21/07 Not likely (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 13:46:24 06/21/07 Wow! - Scotts94z32 13:47:34 06/21/07 He'd probably use JWT (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 13:52:30 06/21/07 What's the deal with posting pictures online, I would think - moxie (SF) 14:47:53 06/21/07 well, this sorta gives the impression that the seller of - CRAZZEPETE. 14:58:44 06/21/07 the rule is, ask for permission especially when selling - WildBill 14:59:06 06/21/07 2nd, happened to me. - Rickytl (ma) 15:15:52 06/21/07 Right - the company or person using the image - TT XTZ 15:45:20 06/21/07 what's weird is, if you take a picture of a person, let's - moxie (SF) 15:59:17 06/21/07 Yeah, that's one I definitely don't understand. - TT XTZ 16:20:40 06/21/07 Celebrities get noticed and love to have pics taken so long - WildBill 02:17:59 06/22/07 True, maybe SpeedyZX can collect some royalties to buy - WildBill 16:57:57 06/21/07 I think its considered "rude" not necessarily illegal (n/m) - dpjax 15:13:16 06/21/07 Hmm, I thought that was bringing George out in public. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 15:50:10 06/21/07 There ought to be a law.... (n/m) - Dustin 20:48:36 06/21/07 Media copyright - found the explanation I was looking for: - TT XTZ 15:51:58 06/21/07 Here is the law explained - NytWolf 17:35:57 06/21/07 haha!... - DVDBURN (MD) 18:30:49 06/21/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.