Subject	2nd. (n/m)
Posted by	imney on June 02, 2007 at 1:06 PM
	This message has been viewed 32 times.
In Reply To	, but the brakes are. (n/m) posted by Dallas DamonZ on June 02, 2007 at 06:18 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Weak Transmissions? - dankennedy24 00:59:10 06/02/07 No. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 01:14:55 06/02/07 , but the brakes are. (n/m) - Dallas DamonZ 06:18:30 06/02/07 + engine bay heat (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 06:29:08 06/02/07 2nd. (n/m) - imney 13:06:45 06/02/07 Re: Weak Transmissions? - ouikikazz 02:12:26 06/02/07 No real weaknesses...just normal wear. (n/m) - Ballistic 02:44:27 06/02/07 Early style injectors (n/m) - na300zx (OH) 03:44:24 06/02/07 Based on my experience my Z 5 sp has not been the >> - ZUL8TR 04:59:42 06/02/07 it's not a part that fails per say .. but since our Z's - The Devils Z 09:21:03 06/02/07 Silicone filled suspension bushings!!!! Absolute junk IMO. - LitlElvis 09:34:00 06/02/07 I was just about to say stock tension rods (n/m) - The Devils Z 09:35:18 06/02/07 Standard industry design and still used today. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 12:16:48 06/02/07 And your point is? They are a compromise at best, - LitlElvis 22:19:52 06/02/07 the car wasn't designed to be an all-out track car. - Guapo 22:32:37 06/02/07 ES now has a 3 pc solution to that problem (n/m) - ztunerz 22:33:11 06/02/07 Due to stock camber and toe in specs, tires will wear - doug8867 12:32:43 06/02/07 The manual tranny in the Z is very beefy... - Only1Z 12:41:39 06/02/07 except for the occasional 2nd and 4th gear synchro - dmcgabe 16:14:52 06/02/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.