Subject	Re: that's more uglier than a 2+2 Z
Posted by	Farkel on April 07, 2007 at 1:44 AM
	This message has been viewed 38 times.
In Reply To	that's more uglier than a 2+2 Z (n/m) posted by SactoTodd on April 06, 2007 at 07:25 PM
Message	Wow.... -------------------
Follow Ups	NZR, but car related / MPG related - awesom-o 18:23:45 04/06/07 that's more uglier than a 2+2 Z (n/m) - SactoTodd 19:25:39 04/06/07 Agreed - awesom-o 20:13:25 04/06/07 Re: that's more uglier than a 2+2 Z - Farkel 01:44:53 04/07/07 In the words of Chicago Transit Authority... - titefit 20:06:04 04/06/07 I wouldn't drive that if it was free. (n/m) - dpjax 21:36:20 04/06/07 big second (n/m) - Rickytl (ma) 02:11:12 04/07/07 I'd drive it, donate it to a smash up derby (n/m) - WildBill 02:33:53 04/07/07 3 wheels, driver & 1 passenger, this is more fun >> - not-hrz 22:33:39 04/06/07 Here's Topgear's report on it. - not-hrz 22:48:15 04/06/07 The Mc Laren F1 is a 3 seater and far from ugly! - z32bob 05:33:06 04/07/07 Good Comparison. (n/m) - Seafordguy 07:43:29 04/07/07 which bears no relevance to this thread ... (n/m) - Guapo 10:03:16 04/07/07 I like tater tots. (n/m) - ZJeweler 11:04:51 04/07/07 What's the Estimated MPG on the McLaren F1? - ni[X]it 12:47:52 04/07/07 Ill take 3! (n/m) - ENVYMYZ 10:16:13 04/07/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.