Subject	Yeah, However heard of
Posted by	eriksu9 on March 09, 2007 at 12:57 PM
	This message has been viewed 57 times.
In Reply To	None that really matters. posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on March 09, 2007 at 12:10 PM
Message	less weight=faster car and faster times? But yeah what is it a couple hundred pds difference between TT, NA and NA 2+2. Not enough to cause a drastic change in times or quickness but I guess all weight reductions add up. :P ****472 RWHP/461 TORQUE ON 110 RACE GAS @21 PSI ****438 RWHP ON 93 OCTANE PUMP GAS/STOCK MOTOR**** ****429 FT LBS/TQ*******************************
Follow Ups	weight differences - thursdaybuff 10:54:17 03/09/07 It depends - ZXRider(SoCal) 11:01:18 03/09/07 None that really matters. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 12:10:58 03/09/07 in 90% of cases, agreed (n/m) - Guapo 12:19:45 03/09/07 But in car magazines testing sports cars it matters. (n/m) - AzHeat 12:36:31 03/09/07 Agreed. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:15:00 03/09/07 Yeah, However heard of - eriksu9 12:57:38 03/09/07 Re: Yeah, WHOEVER I mean. (n/m) - eriksu9 12:59:13 03/09/07 Umm... - BradZ (FL) 13:02:02 03/09/07 I'm chill & relaxed... chillaxed if you will. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:24:15 03/09/07 Keep it real. (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 15:24:22 03/09/07 werd (n/m) - ZXRider(SoCal) 15:46:49 03/09/07 chillaxed.... new word for urban dictionary (n/m) - WildBillZx 16:29:01 03/09/07 that's what i was hoping.. - thursdaybuff 13:00:44 03/09/07 The weight savings between a slicktop and a t-topped Z - ENVYMYZ 13:12:41 03/09/07 50 lbs are not worth losing t-tops, IMO (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 13:38:37 03/09/07 YO is right ... this time :) (n/m) - Guapo 13:51:31 03/09/07 Re: that's what i was hoping.. - zmaxsystems 01:00:04 03/11/07 here you go... - TheKidzAreAllRight (NJ) 13:32:40 03/09/07 the tag on my NA 2x2 says ~4200lb (n/m) - BlackholeZ 20:45:48 03/09/07 that's gross (n/m) - SactoTodd 21:03:58 03/09/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.