Subject	AFC(1) has the same functionality (n/m)
Posted by	aliaZ on March 09, 2007 at 12:23 AM
	This message has been viewed 168 times.
In Reply To	Does the S-AFC(1) handle it the same? posted by SeedyROM on March 09, 2007 at 12:21 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Made my own dual intake based on the stock design.... - The_S_Man (Phoenix) 16:17:57 03/08/07 neat idea - madhatter10-6 16:23:08 03/08/07 looks like the air has to make an abrupt turn. Not good - Guapo 16:27:42 03/08/07 I actually wanted the resistance of the 90 degree turn... - The_S_Man (Phoenix) 23:20:10 03/08/07 Were you running dual mafs on the old set up or just one? (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 16:36:18 03/08/07 2nd - spyhunterTT(nj) 17:35:39 03/08/07 I did have dual MAFs, but no power to the second one. (n/m) - The_S_Man (Phoenix) 17:52:09 03/08/07 wire it up with a safc2 and go from there - spyhunterTT(nj) 18:57:20 03/08/07 he doesn't need dual mafs with that set up. (n/m) - AzHeat 21:40:00 03/08/07 if you already have bought the extra one, why not? (n/m) - spyhunterTT(nj) 06:46:28 03/09/07 i could be wrong on this... - naZeer (Dallas) 16:48:47 03/08/07 Look at it as if it's a stock intake with two JWT filters. - ni[X]it 17:15:39 03/08/07 You are correct.... - The_S_Man (Phoenix) 18:55:10 03/08/07 Interesting. - collegeboy 17:16:43 03/08/07 I didn't like the idea of coveing half the filter.... - The_S_Man (Phoenix) 19:01:07 03/08/07 That is one of the cons of MAF system vs. MAP. - AzHeat 21:37:42 03/08/07 here's a couple of posts you might want to check out - LJZTT 22:41:20 03/08/07 Some Help........ - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 17:24:02 03/08/07 i didn't have to alter the jwt duals. i made a cover. (n/m) - RedSER13 17:30:21 03/08/07 If they are installed correctly they do not need a cover... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 17:33:57 03/08/07 Dual-pop, doolz etc - newageoutlaw911 20:54:57 03/08/07 How would you propose that be done? - Broke_as_**** 22:11:07 03/08/07 While you are at it remove the 90 degree bend - ztunerz 22:19:07 03/08/07 where would you put the air filters then? - SpecNATT (Houston) 00:38:13 03/09/07 LMAO you said 'worser' (n/m) - EricTTZ 02:34:19 03/09/07 look at the bends in the rest of the intake piping - Z32POWER.com 06:27:05 03/09/07 thanks Greg, but i have a greddy bumper - RedSER13 22:19:40 03/08/07 No it doesn't. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:00:26 03/09/07 Call me old-fashioned but to me "dual pop, dual MAF" has - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:58:05 03/08/07 2nd. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 00:03:57 03/09/07 this is the correct solution (n/m) - aliaZ 00:04:52 03/09/07 How does the clearance compare to the Doolz ? - AzHeat 00:05:36 03/09/07 I've installed both - when installed correctly these don't - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:09:33 03/09/07 Does the S-AFC(1) handle it the same? - SeedyROM 00:21:24 03/09/07 AFC(1) has the same functionality (n/m) - aliaZ 00:23:02 03/09/07 Yes - SAFC will do it as well. - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:27:51 03/09/07 Thanks to both of ya - SeedyROM 00:51:44 03/09/07 I have one quick question about this.... - The_S_Man (Phoenix) 07:37:49 03/09/07 No it does not. The AFC gets a live reading from both MAFs - YugoBernie (NoVA) 07:53:51 03/09/07 Thanks... I agree, your setup is preferable! (n/m) - The_S_Man (Phoenix) 08:15:37 03/09/07 yup, that's the only way I could get my Z to run right (n/m) - ZEngineer 07:56:43 03/09/07 Old-fashioned - BigTDogg (MA) 08:06:51 03/09/07 2nd (n/m) - Guapo 10:07:32 03/09/07 Dat shore is purdy! (n/m) - ENVYMYZ 14:22:07 03/09/07 Is that the only way to hook up two functional - 300NASeattle 15:19:27 03/09/07 The depending on the program on your ECU the AFC takes - YugoBernie (NoVA) 17:44:45 03/09/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.