Subject	thanks...very helpful info...what about ride height?
Posted by	zresearcher on January 29, 2007 at 7:10 PM
	This message has been viewed 48 times.
In Reply To	i have both, for true street use i prefer the bfg posted by Magnum on January 29, 2007 at 06:59 PM
Message	I was concerned about the MT ET streets being unstable at higher highway speeds. The BFG drag radials measure 26.1 " tall, and most 245/45 or 225/50s on the stock front rims measure 24.6" tall. Is the difference in ride height a stability issue?
Follow Ups	Latest on BFG drag radials...no recent posts in search - zresearcher 18:52:16 01/29/07 Go with the MT drag radials - TTFairladyZ 18:57:02 01/29/07 You're obviously not "researching" because BFG Drag Radials - twinturbopoweredz 18:57:47 01/29/07 key words here "recent posts" - zresearcher 19:01:36 01/29/07 Then you could of just typed in "drag radials" - twinturbopoweredz 19:05:18 01/29/07 i have both, for true street use i prefer the bfg - Magnum 18:59:27 01/29/07 thanks...very helpful info...what about ride height? - zresearcher 19:10:05 01/29/07 I have the mt's on a stock rim and they are fine up to 80, - Magnum 19:40:24 01/29/07 The MT ET Streets and the BFG drag radials arent in the same - TTFairladyZ 20:13:41 01/29/07 Try BFG KDW 225/55ZR16 on the front - citation 20:26:00 01/29/07 Both will be too squirrely in the twisties...once again, - RAGTPZ 19:23:31 01/29/07 ouch... (n/m) - Alex'sVG30DETT (SoFL) 21:25:01 01/29/07 Amen. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 06:49:28 01/30/07 (Total Hits: a lot) (n/m) - Guapo 09:17:15 01/30/07 I suggest the MT - citation 20:19:36 01/29/07 Lets talk about ride height.... - zresearcher 23:00:40 01/29/07 Can't say, installed Eibach springs and lowered car .75" - citation 13:22:24 01/30/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.