Subject	yep
Posted by	Z32POWER.com on January 29, 2007 at 2:59 PM
	This message has been viewed 168 times.
In Reply To	The ONLY benefit to going that route is the weight savings posted by ENVYMYZ on January 29, 2007 at 02:38 PM
Message	and 1. much easier to work on all around. no pulling a goddamn motor to change turbos. no removing intake plenum to change injectors. 100% easier to work on than the VG (in place) 2. the 2.6L vs 3.0L displacement/torque is outweighed by the revability of the motor. 9k stock, tits. #1 is huge to me... and the motor has just as much potential if not more than the VG. how many main bearings does the VG have? thats the weak spot. downfalls 1. limited parts availability (but not really too much worse than the vg) 2. work involved to getting the swap done (wiring, fabbing, electrical)
Follow Ups	Sorta Z-Related: RB26/Z32 Forums - www.rbz32.com - BOOZTD 3 14:31:52 01/29/07 "for some of us and our goals, it makes sense." - Kenny 14:35:14 01/29/07 what are you saying? (n/m) - 1badz32 (MN) 15:10:29 01/29/07 do you contribute anything here? (n/m) - collegeboy 18:14:10 01/29/07 The ONLY benefit to going that route is the weight savings - ENVYMYZ 14:38:26 01/29/07 I didnt start this thread to battle the VG30 vs the RB motor - BOOZTD 3 14:39:42 01/29/07 hey you know whats easier than a rb? a 20B ;-) - Shawn Lane(NO VA) 17:28:28 01/29/07 Can rb30's still rev 9k+? (n/m) - CaliguyPurdue (redesigning) 18:27:42 01/29/07 I guess a turbo swap wouldn't be much easier... (n/m) - sfarrah 14:50:36 01/29/07 lol...... (n/m) - BOOZTD 3 14:59:26 01/29/07 Some people like pulling thier engines to change turbo's (n/m) - 1badz32 (MN) 15:00:24 01/29/07 yep - Z32POWER.com 14:59:22 01/29/07 I was actually considering going that route - ENVYMYZ 15:07:20 01/29/07 yea, definitelly not the cheapest route (n/m) - Z32POWER.com 15:15:28 01/29/07 If I was starting with NA and I wanted to go big - maglito 23:05:06 01/29/07 Wow...What a shame for the Z32 community to have a website - TheTwinZ (Peru) 14:39:52 01/29/07 my god, what is with you people? - BOOZTD 3 14:42:18 01/29/07 Dont you know anything... - 1badz32 (MN) 14:55:09 01/29/07 By creating my bumper I was just giving a nice option for - TheTwinZ (Peru) 14:56:00 01/29/07 I'm sorry but you wont see me promoting the RB motor.... - BOOZTD 3 14:58:48 01/29/07 Read his post again. - ENVYMYZ 15:09:31 01/29/07 good idea, I'm all for ambitious projects - ZEngineer 14:50:38 01/29/07 that would be awesome to see.... - BOOZTD 3 15:01:25 01/29/07 last I checked he was cutting & moving the firewall back - ZEngineer 15:09:00 01/29/07 Bah. SR20DET. That's what the car should had in the first - MixManMash 15:15:06 01/29/07 but a couple of SR20's would fetch a premium a week before - ZEngineer 15:17:38 01/29/07 you bet they would! Just not sure how they would fit into - MixManMash 15:38:08 01/29/07 lol, that's on TV right now (n/m) - boss balla 15:50:59 01/29/07 No. (n/m) - spicyZ 17:08:39 01/29/07 I thought you were into Drag Racing? Isn't the torque - Agner.S(CT) 14:54:32 01/29/07 9's are the tip of the iceberg for RB powered cars... - BOOZTD 3 14:57:08 01/29/07 Fair enough. - Agner.S(CT) 19:58:30 01/29/07 Unfortunately, its not. (n/m) - maglito 23:07:25 01/29/07 ... Ditka ... (n/m) - Guapo 15:07:16 01/29/07 But what if was the hurricane's name was Ditka? (n/m) - HillZTT 15:43:00 01/29/07 Great idea - 952+2TT 15:34:15 01/29/07 forum looks neat and I like the swap potential-good work! - mossyoak 16:25:21 01/29/07 Good Job! - puntman87 17:19:59 01/29/07 It's not that people "don't agree" - SeedyROM 20:38:58 01/29/07 Thanks....a realistic post to what im doing :) - BOOZTD 3 20:43:00 01/29/07 Pretty much why I was civil about it =) - SeedyROM 20:58:53 01/29/07 He is using the same guys that built the nixit approved RB Z - maglito 23:09:36 01/29/07 Good stuff. - ZiNnYc 20:46:10 01/29/07
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.