| 
	
		|  |  
     |  |  
		|  |  |  |  
		| Subject | Agreed. I measure my NA's worth... |  |  
		|  |  |  |  
		| Posted by | BradZ (FL) on November 12, 2006 at 8:28 PM |  |  
	|  | This message has been viewed 43 times. |  |  
		|  |  |  |  
	| In Reply To | For those that say the NA should never have been built posted by giotx on November 12, 2006 at 05:22 PM |  |  
		|  |  |  |  
		| Message | by the number of higher horsepower cars it has beaten on the track. 
 
 -Brad1992 Z32 2+2 NA
 1996 B14 SE-R
 1986 Z31 Coupe NA (For Sale)
 ________________________
 "You were 100% correct." - Kenny on October 10, 2006 at 1:15 PM"2+2s must be carnivorous. Right Brad?" - Barry'z (NJ) on July 29, 2006 at 11:39 PM
 "car or kitten... ill kick the crap out of it!" - VG30DE racer on July 14, 2006 at 3:45 PM
 "They turn their head because the 2+2 is sooo long." - ZJeweler(ssm300z) on July 13, 2006 at 4:43 PM
 "The Z was meant for the track, not the dragstrip." - Moxie on May 01, 2006 at 3:03 PM
 "Let me brake the news to all those ignorant old folks in this forum." - nightriderZ on July 14, 2005 at 2:33 AM
 "...Stage III does require an ECU upgrade MORAN..." - djtz1 on June 29, 2005 at 3:34 PM
 |  |  
		|  |  |  |  
		| Follow Ups |  |  |  
		|  |  |  |  Post a Followup
 | 
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
 |  | 
		|  |  |  |  
		|  |  |  |  |