Subject	I guess it would have to be because of limitations....
Posted by	WAGGZ on November 03, 2006 at 10:57 PM
	This message has been viewed 54 times.
In Reply To	Such as? posted by SactoTodd on November 03, 2006 at 10:46 PM
Message	but the L-28 I had in my 280Z back home would have been way better than that set-up, given the fact that it would meet the standards of GT2. It was an L-28 Turbo block with the 3.1 stroker(L-28 Diesel crank, L-26 rods, and forged KA24DE style pistons *if I remember correctly*), O.S.Giken DOHC competition head, EFI, and tuned for 100LL aviation fuel. My 280 screamed and I doubt that my setup was much heavier than this guy's.
Follow Ups	Only 62K? - Spddracer 21:57:37 11/03/06 An L-28 engine swap? Why? - WAGGZ 22:26:55 11/03/06 Re phrase... Why the L-28 as the choice engine? - WAGGZ 22:36:13 11/03/06 Such as? - SactoTodd 22:46:24 11/03/06 I guess it would have to be because of limitations.... - WAGGZ 22:57:20 11/03/06 I don't mean weight of the motor - SactoTodd 23:04:29 11/03/06 I see now... - WAGGZ 23:42:16 11/03/06 awesome to see him representing what the Z32 is capable of! (n/m) - Guapo 23:20:50 11/03/06 With a set of jspecs and light up center, it might be worth - upcominZ_(NOLA) 23:55:22 11/03/06 looks like very little of the z32 is left in it though (n/m) - moxie 12:17:25 11/04/06 Other than the tail lights how does that race car have - IBPimpn 12:51:17 11/04/06 :) (n/m) - Guapo 23:15:01 11/04/06 can you downsize your sig please? (n/m) - Dallas DamonZ 01:02:20 11/04/06 Ummm. - Spddracer 15:46:22 11/04/06 thank you (n/m) - Dallas DamonZ 17:58:14 11/04/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.