| Other than the information that may be of benefit to others. I built my own manifolds; I dont know what they flow, but I know they must be doing a very good job as the setup I have built is working over the broadest scale I've yet seen in a VG30DETT without nitrous. I only sell products that I R&D and manufacture for sale. I dont resell anyone's products. The way I see it, Mike Smith and Jon Abeler both deserve merit, equally, for their efforts. I dont have beef or prefer either one of them more than the other - they are only acquaintences in my life. I call it as I see it. When I see a flowtest of a component that is strapped to another component, I realize the test is NOT exclusive to the component in question. You, of all people, should realize this and understand what I am arguing. I want an exclusive test, not a test of a head+manifold, not a test of a manifold+turbo, not a test of anything other than the manifold itself. No-one has done this as of yet, I'm offering to do it for free, and yet, the griping ensues. I really dont get it. Give me exclusive flow results of the manifolds, and until then, your test is flawed so long as you call it a "manifold flow test". If you want to call it a cylinder head+manifold flow test, that's fine with me. We all know the conditions of the test - I'm just telling you that it is flawed simply because it was not an exclusive flow test.
[ ashspecz.com ]
[ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] Enthusiasts soon understand each other. --W. Irving.
Are you an enthusiast? If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor.
Albert Einstein
|
