Subject	in your situation, i'd definitely go with the NA >>
Posted by	maverick (Knicks v Lakers) on May 03, 2001 at 8:23 PM
	This message has been viewed 11 times.
In Reply To	Re: If you are looking for power, forget the NA and look at posted by MSIMZ on May 03, 2001 at 07:56 PM
Message	generally speaking, a TT will cost a lot more to maintain than an NA because there's so much more you need to worry about (turbo's, intercoolers, etc) if something does go wrong. if you're concerned with $$$ and want a decently quick ride with killer looks, an NA Z can't be beaten =) as far as numbers go: stock NA: 0-60 ~ 6.8 to 7.2 sec / quarter mile in 15.5 stage3: 0-60 ~ 6.2 to 6.6 sec / quarter mile in 14.8 stock TT: 0-60 ~ 5.2 to 5.6 sec / quarter mile in 14.0 stage3: 0-60 ~ 4.6 to 5.0 sec / quarter mile in 13.2 mike kim_michael@jpmorgan.com 1990 PearlGold Stage3 NA
Follow Ups	Some help please? - MSIMZ 19:34:07 05/03/01 If you are looking for power, forget the NA and look at TT - Patrick [Buffalo] 19:48:32 05/03/01 Re: If you are looking for power, forget the NA and look at - MSIMZ 19:56:34 05/03/01 in your situation, i'd definitely go with the NA >> - maverick (Knicks v Lakers) 20:23:15 05/03/01 Agreed. Only go TT if no money worries (n/m) - Patrick [Buffalo] 05:54:21 05/04/01 i second that. (n/m) - Anosh 20:04:11 05/03/01 Re: Some help please? - Bobby12many(c'mon_BUCKS!) 19:53:01 05/03/01 Re: Re: Some help please? - MSIMZ 20:18:34 05/03/01 Stuff to look out for? - MSIMZ 20:36:36 05/03/01 Look under FAQ, I believe there is a pretty good writeup (n/m) - slickB 21:42:02 05/03/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.