 |

  |
 |
| |
|
|
| Subject |
Not true... |
 |
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
WhiteboyZ(IN) on September 05, 2006 at 11:16 AM |
 |
| |
This message has been viewed 49 times. |
 |
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
Re: Re: posted by Kenny on September 05, 2006 at 09:04 AM |
 |
| |
|
|
| Message |
VR4 are not variable...they are permanently 45% front, 55% rear drive. It is also not true to say they are slower than Z's stock. It's completely subjective to which tests and years you refer to. The variable test figures apply to both cars. Personally, my VR4 stock ran 13.7, 13.3 on only a boost contoller (stock filter), and gutted pre cats. Never ran my Z stock...but intake, ECU, boost and catback went 13.3. I agree that the Z is a better track car...but the VR4 does NOT simply just plow through the corners. As far as transmissions go, they do not blow up. They do have syncro issues, as does the Z. If you were thinking of the DSM all wheel trans, then you sir would be correct. There are weaker transfer cases in the 93 and earlier models.
 |
 |
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|