Subject	Looks good for those turbos. They aren't really as laggy
Posted by	Ash's Z on August 23, 2006 at 10:32 AM
	This message has been viewed 56 times.
In Reply To	dyno results posted by beemc on August 23, 2006 at 06:33 AM
Message	as the dynapak would lead you to believe. Put the car on a dynojet 248X and you'll see more of a real-world result. What was the A/F mixture tuned to? [ ashspecz.com ] [ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] Enthusiasts soon understand each other. --W. Irving. Are you an enthusiast? If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor. Albert Einstein
Follow Ups	dyno results - beemc 06:33:28 08/23/06 resized - zeroflake 06:50:39 08/23/06 Flywheel HP? Are they backing that number out? (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 08:03:33 08/23/06 No, it's RWHP. SGP's sheets always read that way. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 10:06:47 08/23/06 Didn't they log manifold pressure and AFR also? It'd be good - Scotts94z32 10:08:36 08/23/06 Looks good for those turbos. They aren't really as laggy - Ash's Z 10:32:25 08/23/06 That graph makes them look laggy as - CaliguyPurdue 11:12:22 08/23/06 Just FYI>>> - Scotts94z32 11:25:37 08/23/06 Good to know... - CaliguyPurdue 11:39:30 08/23/06 Sounds like you're more of a GT28R candidate...You have time (n/m) - Scotts94z32 12:52:36 08/23/06 I promise you.. there is "no lag" when you drive the car - Shawn300zTT GT28R MD 13:20:31 08/23/06 I wouldn't mind this SP530 dyno (Joe NoVA) either: - Scotts94z32 12:08:50 08/24/06 I actually went into a rather length response initially - Ash's Z 11:47:47 08/23/06 That looks alot better! I would think some super split - BigTDogg (MA) 13:18:12 08/23/06 That was with stock manifolds too. With a fully built setup - Ash's Z 15:27:28 08/23/06 Needs more AF curve. (n/m) - Kenny 10:43:06 08/23/06 Hmm... says 350Z at the top... (n/m) - Kaz (Dallas) 11:40:51 08/23/06 Run Id says Silver300TTLA2 (n/m) - John@z1 13:01:39 08/23/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.