TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - No. I agree with what you're saying. I conveyed this to the
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject No. I agree with what you're saying. I conveyed this to the
     
Posted by ENVYMYZ on August 17, 2006 at 10:58 PM
  This message has been viewed 103 times.
     
In Reply To Adjustable suspension parts shouldn't be used as a fix for posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on August 17, 2006 at 10:40 PM
     
Message shop doing the repairs as well (Ultimate Z.) Their response was that there was no frame damage (which is what we both suspected from the beginning.)

There was visibly nothing wrong with the geometry of the front suspension, which is why nothing was replaced. The rear subframe was bent and that was replaced along with the bent shock. The only reason im replacing these parts with upgraded aftermarket parts, is because I dont see the point of replacing them with stock parts. If im going to replace them anyways, I might as well spend the few extra parts and upgrade. No?

Here is the first suspension spec sheet followed by todays attempt:


The alignment shop tried to overcompensate on the drivers side front camber to make up for the left. What would you say is needed to finish up that front?



"Losers always whine about doing their best, Winners go home and screw the prom queen"

-Sean Connery

"The sports car's sole purpose is to entertain the driver, and one very lucky passenger."

- Unknown

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.