Subject	IMHO a 2+2 needs something - the hatch is too long
Posted by	dogpile (used to be dogpile) on May 02, 2006 at 11:17 AM
	This message has been viewed 37 times.
In Reply To	Bare-assed posted by peanut squirrel on May 02, 2006 at 10:19 AM
Message	Whether it's a tall one or that 1990 replica one, it makes the car look a lot shorter. I think you can get away with a taller wing on a 2+2 than you could on a coupe as long as it doesn't stick out past the rear of the car (ie: whichever f40 style wing sticks straight up > the wings west mid wing) I personally loved the stillen type 3 wing I had on my 2+2. I thought it shortened the look of the car a lot, and since the hatch is bigger than a coupe's, the wing didn't look nearly as large. I'm not a fan of that wing on a coupe - it's too overpowering. /2 pennies
Follow Ups	Attn: rear wiper shavers - peanut squirrel 08:26:27 05/02/06 nope, don't miss mine.. then again do not drive in rain - MidLifeZ 08:35:22 05/02/06 2nd (n/m) - Smitytec 08:36:57 05/02/06 After putting on the Kaminari wing... - kayoz 08:42:34 05/02/06 should have shaved it, didn't, regretted it. (n/m) - ZEngineer 08:51:42 05/02/06 2nd (n/m) - KevinsFairlady 08:55:12 05/02/06 less is more ;-) (n/m) - wilkendw 09:14:10 05/02/06 nope. looks cleaner and it doesn't rain here in cali. =) (n/m) - RedSER13 09:16:59 05/02/06 Rain-X (n/m) - spicyZ 09:27:45 05/02/06 Re: Rain-X - 90TTZ 11:07:34 05/02/06 False. RainX would rock. (n/m) - Drk93TT 12:05:18 05/02/06 Rain-X is the only product that after trying it, I said WOW! - not-hrz 20:47:31 05/02/06 AquaPel = RainX on steroids (n/m) - Luke@tirerack 07:27:56 05/03/06 think i would miss it, i use it all the time when >> - stockplayerz (NYC) 09:34:28 05/02/06 2nd (n/m) - spyhunter(nj) 10:01:16 05/02/06 3nd. - TT XTZ 10:14:34 05/02/06 wingless + wiperless = clean (n/m) - Guapo 10:17:06 05/02/06 = wuss. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 10:27:08 05/02/06 too bad thats the only angle of my car you'll get to see :) (n/m) - Guapo 10:38:30 05/02/06 I'm ok w. that. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 11:30:28 05/02/06 you were talking to bernie not me :) (n/m) - CollegeBoy 12:04:15 05/02/06 correct (n/m) - Guapo 12:11:34 05/02/06 negative on no accoutrements.. :) See sig - MidLifeZ 10:19:04 05/02/06 With that example, it's okay with a wing. - TT XTZ 10:22:21 05/02/06 Bare-assed - peanut squirrel 10:19:22 05/02/06 Well, knock on wood, - TT XTZ 10:28:08 05/02/06 IMHO a 2+2 needs something - the hatch is too long - dogpile (used to be dogpile) 11:17:14 05/02/06 Big 'ol 2nd. (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 11:35:21 05/02/06 Big 'ol 3rd. (n/m) - Z U N L 12:42:58 05/02/06 i know what you mean! just got rid of the wing myself >> - stockplayerz (NYC) 10:35:58 05/02/06 Really? - peanut squirrel 11:10:43 05/02/06 wings west midwing (n/m) - stockplayerz (NYC) 11:50:48 05/02/06 Re: took it off never looked back. (n/m) - natottz 11:19:44 05/02/06 I'm so happy I shaved mine off, looks so much better. (n/m) - Payce 11:21:32 05/02/06 Don't miss it one bit. Car looks much nicer now. - jkeyser14 11:40:28 05/02/06 nawwwwwws ;) (n/m) - Waco300zx 11:45:47 05/02/06 Power switch for hardwired V1... (n/m) - Mongoose 23:49:17 05/02/06 looks way better without it (n/m) - CollegeBoy 12:07:20 05/02/06 I don't get why people would want to remove it - Moxie 12:35:20 05/02/06 Makes the Z look like a minivan - peanut squirrel 13:40:13 05/02/06 Maybe because youngsters are all about looks? (n/m) - IBPimpn 19:13:47 05/02/06 No regrets in getting rid of it. IMHO, it has no purpose. - spotz 14:57:59 05/02/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.