| A.) The owners names were not included this year as last year there were several complaints about them being included. B.) As far as an 18 month calendar, while in theory that would be nice, the production cost is considerably greater which would raise the price some what substantially so I dont see that happening. We will most likely include some sort of carryover page taking into consideration January and February from this year's calendar. C.) In regards to the dates, you are right and I honestly had not noticed until now. The date issue I beleive to have been caused by a column adjustment in the layout revamp to include January and February of 2007. I should have caught that in pre-press but was more concearned with verifying the other data, like the factotids etc. Thats ultimately my fault and I should have caught it.
 |
