TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Pretty cool.. why don't they make all MT's like that?
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject Pretty cool.. why don't they make all MT's like that?
     
Posted by socos (Deadlock victim) on April 12, 2001 at 11:50 PM
  This message has been viewed 224 times.
     
In Reply To Anyone want a sequential shifter for their tranny? posted by John Y(Houston) on April 12, 2001 at 06:57 PM
     
Message Something like that is just a bunch of gears and doodads moving the stick for you. still gotta hit the clutch.. but man, something like that can't be that hard to mass produce.

That brings me to something I've always wanted to know.. as an auto-whore (haha), I've driven MT a couple times, but the whole process of shifting bothered me. Has the whole "gas-out/clutch-in, shift, clutch out/gas-in" process EVER changed since cars have been invented? Isn't it about time SOME new way of doing that came about that is available for mass produced cars? (Not that fake manumatic stuff) It just seems so inefficient and prone to error to me.

Is it too hard to have one of those shifters and some electric widget push in the clutch and kill the gas for you? Maybe have it wired to the shift gate. I'm no engineer, but something like that seems possible. Just seems like a lack of innovation in trannies to me. Everything else about cars seems to have evolved but that.

No auto vs manual flames please! :)
















DBD::ODBC::st execute failed: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Your transaction (process ID #22) was deadlocked with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun your transaction. (SQL-40001)(DBD: st_execute/SQLExecute err=-1) at incl_db.pm line 324.

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.