Subject	Re: You helped me interpret something correctly in this thre
Posted by	Kenny on January 12, 2006 at 12:21 PM
	This message has been viewed 28 times.
In Reply To	You helped me interpret something correctly in this thread posted by ZEngineer on January 12, 2006 at 12:18 PM
Message	Well it's hard to tell when you're arguing just to harass me or if you're actually confused about something. I see that you were sincerely not understanding my premise, so sorry about the comment. I'll have to use it some other time instead, lol. Recursively Yours, Kenny... PETZ Member #5 SteamyZ. Never had did me wrong. - SL103 07/06/04 11:58:15
Follow Ups	Bar vs kg/cm^2 vs psi etc..... - Joe(NoVA) 09:29:29 01/12/06 :D - BigTDogg (MA) 09:41:22 01/12/06 Different 'stokes' for different folks......... (n/m) - 240Z FeO2 10:04:32 01/12/06 Tony likes to see big numbers - ZEngineer 10:08:41 01/12/06 haha. For some really big nos., how about using nanometers? (n/m) - 240Z FeO2 10:22:30 01/12/06 No Planck lengths, no care. (n/m) - Kenny 10:25:35 01/12/06 I prefer to use angstroms actually. Expwnents :) (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 10:41:36 01/12/06 For a bigger # than 32.2 ft H20 use feet of air ;) (n/m) - ZUL8TR 11:12:59 01/12/06 how do you say it? "foot waters"? (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 12:11:09 01/12/06 Feet of water, like Milimeters of Mercury (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 12:35:56 01/12/06 ah, sweet :) (n/m) - mousersix (San Antonio) 20:24:40 01/12/06 That's nice... - Kenny 09:57:16 01/12/06 "most boost controllers vary +/- 2 psi" - ZEngineer 10:02:00 01/12/06 I didn't say electronic controllers. - Kenny 10:14:57 01/12/06 Ok, people are thinking two different things here. You are - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 10:27:48 01/12/06 if the accuracy was really +/-2psi, why would Blitz(example) - ZEngineer 10:42:48 01/12/06 my blitz reads to 0.1 psi (n/m) - Guapo 10:45:13 01/12/06 that further proves the point that +-2psi doesn't make sense (n/m) - ZEngineer 10:49:53 01/12/06 Did you even read my post? - Kenny 10:53:21 01/12/06 If it takes it to 0.000001, it has nothing to do with - Guapo 11:02:59 01/12/06 Significant figures implies differently... (n/m) - Scotts94z32 11:20:12 01/12/06 I can't believe you guys aren't getting this. - Kenny 11:25:08 01/12/06 I was actually talking about the gauge itself. El Guapo - Scotts94z32 11:57:36 01/12/06 Two different issues. - Guapo 12:03:23 01/12/06 Now I'm clear on what you meant - ZEngineer 12:07:50 01/12/06 There we go. - Kenny 12:16:50 01/12/06 How well it controls to a setpoint is a totally different - Z-Jay (Edmonton, AB) 11:13:00 01/12/06 Exactly. - Kenny 11:15:33 01/12/06 You helped me interpret something correctly in this thread - ZEngineer 12:18:01 01/12/06 Re: You helped me interpret something correctly in this thre - Kenny 12:21:47 01/12/06 I appreciate the warning, I'll start working on a rebuttle - ZEngineer 12:26:31 01/12/06 Yeah, that's why i prefaced the last paragraph - Joe(NoVA) 10:03:19 01/12/06 Indeed =). (n/m) - Kenny 10:10:53 01/12/06 Cool deal Joe, and thanks for the clarification! (n/m) - Ash's Z 12:37:28 01/12/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.